• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / a7RII AF vs color plane — Zony 35/2.8

a7RII AF vs color plane — Zony 35/2.8

February 29, 2016 JimK Leave a Comment

I’m taking a break from the medium tele testing to run down an AF anomaly I stumbled onto with the Batis 85/1.8 on the Sony a7RII. That lens has considerable longitudinal chromatic aberration (LoCA), and, when the camera is in autofocus (AF) mode, it focuses systematically in the wrong place, on the side of the red channel MTF50 peak that is farther from the green and blue channel MTF50 peaks, not slightly to the red channel peal side of the green channel peak.

Testing with the Sony 90/2.8 FE Macro lens, which doesn’t have as much LoCA, revealed no such abnormality. Is the problem the LoCA of the 85/1.8, or is it something else? Enter the Zony 35/2.8, a honey, no, a jewel of a lens, that, while it is small and reasonably sharp, has considerable LoCA.

I lit a slanted-edge target with two Westcott LED panels, and set the color temperature to 5000K. This is the target, with the Horshack grid in the center.

LaCA Target Horshack

I mounted a Sony a7RII with the Sony/Zeiss 35mm f/2.8 FE attached to the Cognisys computer-driven focusing rail. I set the controller up to use 192mm of travel and make 49 exposures 4mm apart. I set the assembly 3.5 feet from the on-axis target, mounted the lens, focused a little short of mid-rail using manual focusing, and focused on the grid using AF-S with  flexible spot,  AF priority, and all three spot sizes in turn. I exposed 49-shot series with the lens wide open.  I used Jack Hogan’s Matlab program, MTF Mapper, and DCRAW to pick the horizontal edges and calculate the MTF50s for the raw color planes, imported the data into Excel, and plotted the results in cycles per picture height vs subject distance change.

The manual focused results for a horizontal edge:

35 mf h

And the vertical edge results:

35 mf v

We can see that the blue channel peak is higher for the vertical edge.  We can also see that there is so much LoCA that, when I focused, Iset the camera in a position so that I missed the red channel peak at the close end of the rail travel.

AF with a small spot, horizontal edge:

35 af s h

The vertical edge:

35 af s v

The AF didn’t get all three color panes in focus. How could it with that much LoCA?  However, with the exception of one random point, it got the important plane, the green plane, in focus. As a bonus, we got sharp results for the blue plane, and credible results for the red one. I call that AF doing a good job in the face of a lot of LoCA.

Just for drill, here are the graphs for the medium and large spot sizes:

Medium spot, horizontal edge
Medium spot, horizontal edge
Medium spot, vertical edge
Medium spot, vertical edge
Large spot, horizontal edge
Large spot, horizontal edge

 

Large spot, vertical edge
Large spot, vertical edge

The larger spot sizes are more consistent — in the case of the large spot, that’s a surprise to me, since the medium spot is already larger than the Horshack focusing grid — but the trend is the same.

The Last Word

← Another medium tele test — Batis AF with a new focus target a7RII LoCA & AF vs color plane — Zony 55/1.8 →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.