the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / a7RII LoCA & AF vs color plane — Zony 55/1.8

a7RII LoCA & AF vs color plane — Zony 55/1.8

March 1, 2016 JimK 2 Comments

While testing a group of medium tele lenses on tha Sony a7RII, I came up with a way to examine longitudinal chromatic aberration (LoCA). Then I noticed that the a7RII’s autofocus (AF) optimized the red raw plane with the Batis 85. That seemed strange. I tested the Sony/Zeiss (Zony) 35mm f/2.8 and the Sony 90mm f/2.8 macro, and found that they behaved as expested. Today I’m taking a look at the Zony 55/1.8.

I lit a slanted-edge target with two Westcott LED panels, and set the color temperature to 5000K. I mounted a Sony a7RII with the Sony/Zeiss 55mm f/1.8 FE attached to the Cognisys computer-driven focusing rail. I set the controller up to use 192mm of travel and make 49 exposures 4mm apart. I set the assembly 5.5 feet from the on-axis target, mounted the lens, focused a little short of mid-rail using manual focusing, and focused on the grid using AF-S with  flexible spot,  AF priority, and small and medium spot sizes in turn. I exposed 49-shot series with the lens wide open.  I used Jack Hogan’s Matlab program, MTF Mapper, and DCRAW to pick the horizontal edges and calculate the MTF50s for the raw color planes, imported the data into Excel, and plotted the results in cycles per picture height vs subject distance change.

Here is the manually focused analysis of the horizontal edges:

zony55 mf h

There is a moderate amout of LoCA present. Note that it’s possible to get MTF50s of over 800 cy/ph for all layers simultaneously, focusing in that manner would cause the importatn green channel to be way off its 1200 cy/ph capability.

Looking at the vertical edges:

zony55 mf v

The green channel doesn’t go quite as high, indicating a tiny bit of astigmatism.

Autofocus with a medium spot size, horizontal edges:

zony55 afm h

It looks like tha AAF system, faced with the LoCA, is trying to compromise. At least the focus point is on the right side of the red channel peak.

Same situation, but for the vertical edges:

zony55 afm v

That looks better. The astigmatism meant that the AF system couldn’t peak both the vertical and the horizontal edges, and it chose the horizontal ones. A wise move, but probably a mindless one; we have seen before that Sony AF shows a preference for vertical edges.

With a small spot size, which puts the spot entirely inside the focusing grid, the system doesn’t focus every shot. Here are data for what the AF could manage out of 49 tries, horizontal edges:

zony55 afs h

And now vertical edges:

zony55 afs v

When the AF system decided it was happy, the results are just about as good as with the medium spot.

This is really good AF performance. It is better than I can do manually.

The Last Word

← a7RII AF vs color plane — Zony 35/2.8 a7RII LoCA & AF vs color plane — Sony 70-200/4 →

Comments

  1. Jack Hogan says

    March 2, 2016 at 12:17 am

    Excellent, Jim. And pretty decent performance by the AF. It would be interesting to see once with the camera in one spot how your best blind manual focus peaking would compare to the moving rail ‘manual’ focus curves. In other words, what’s the smallest typical step one can aspire to when focusing manually with the focus ring at low f-numbers with a lens like this (or a typical one of your choice)?

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. A Longitudinal CA Metric for Photographers | Strolls with my Dog says:
    March 21, 2016 at 8:26 am

    […] perusing Jim Kasson’s excellent Longitudinal Chromatic Aberration tests I was impressed by the quantity and quality of the […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

March 2023
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Jan    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S pixel shift, visuals
  • Sarmed Mirza on Fujifilm GFX 100S pixel shift, visuals
  • lancej on Two ways to improve the Q2 handling
  • JimK on Sony 135 STF on GFX-50R, sharpness
  • K on Sony 135 STF on GFX-50R, sharpness
  • Mal Paso on Christmas tree light bokeh with the XCD 38V on the X2D
  • Sebastian on More on tilted adapters
  • JimK on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • Kyle Krug on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • JimK on Hasselblad X2D electronic shutter scan time

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.