• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / An attractive offer, spurned

An attractive offer, spurned

December 12, 2023 JimK 8 Comments

A flattering thing happened to me today. A camera manufacturer offered to send me a copy of a soon to be announced, quite expensive camera for me to review. In return, I could keep the camera.

It only took me a few seconds to realize that I had to say no. I think a lot of my credibility depends on reviewing cameras that I purchase on the open market, so that there is no question of my being beholden to any manufacturer. I have accepted a small number of pre-release products to review, since I can’t just go out and buy them. In that case, I always disclose how I got the product, and, when the testing is done, the products go back to the manufacturer.

This is different. Keeping a valuable piece of photographic gear in return for a review would raise the question in readers’ minds about how impartial I was in the reviewing. Indeed, it might actually make me less impartial. I can’t take that chance.

The Last Word

← Foveon Merrill color accuracy Foveon Merrill color accuracy, continued →

Comments

  1. Mike Nelson Pedde says

    December 12, 2023 at 6:38 pm

    Good for you. Integrity is being able to look yourself in the mirror…

    Reply
    • Michael says

      December 13, 2023 at 5:47 am

      Articulating your reasons clearly for refusing an expensive gift helps you to maintain your disinvested bias. Well done.

      Reply
  2. Christer Almqvist says

    December 14, 2023 at 10:04 am

    Now we shall all keep our eyes open for a “soon to be announced, quite expensive camera “.

    Reply
  3. N/A says

    December 14, 2023 at 9:19 pm

    what is the problem to review and then return the camera back though ? unless this is from manufacturer totally not interesting for OP ( think Canon ) …

    Reply
  4. JaapD says

    December 18, 2023 at 3:54 am

    Hi Jim, speaking for myself I won’t question your credibility if you had taken the offer from the manufacturer. I understand your point turning the offer down, but I see it as a missed opportunity to yourself (acquiring something nice for free) and even more towards your community. Your community would have benefitted from this big time through your thorough and detailed review results. Moreover, your community would be more than capable to distinguish your review from all those other ones, shouting how good and improved this new product is in relation to its predecessor.

    In the end it’s by all means your and only your decision.

    All the best!
    JaapD.

    Reply
  5. Milton Mpounas says

    January 12, 2024 at 6:31 pm

    You should have said yes. We trust you.

    Reply
  6. Mike says

    February 4, 2024 at 11:37 am

    I think you made the right choice Jim. Regardless of the manufacturers intent, you note yourself that, even aside from appearances, accepting such an offer could lead to a less objective review – if you feel in their debt that’s perhaps almost inevitable.

    Good call

    Reply
  7. Robin says

    August 4, 2024 at 2:05 pm

    “unconscious bias”

    It’s a thing that exists. And that every YouTube pundit ignores.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.