• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Auto-bracketing on the M240

Auto-bracketing on the M240

November 3, 2013 JimK Leave a Comment

I went for a walk this morning, and took along what is becoming my constant companion when I don’t have anything particular in mind, but I think that a picture might jump out in front of me: the M240 with the 28mm Elmarit-M ASPH. No EVF. Small, light, and unobtrusive. The 28 is pretty soft in the corners wide open, but steadies down at f/4, and is quite a respectable performer at f/5.6 and f/8. Don’t go beyond f/8 unless you need the DOF.

Anyway, I decided to play around with some handheld HDR. I set the camera up for sets of three images, two stops apart, and told it to expose all here automatically. I like this last option, which is missing on my D4 and D800E. When you’ve got the auto-expose mode selected, you press the shutter once, and the camera makes all the images in the set as fast as it can. It will do this if the motor is set to S, and it will also do it if the motor is set to C.

You don’t want to set the motor to C when you’re hand holding. Here’s why. You’ll get the images framed closer to the same way if you hold the shutter button down until the end of the sequence, rather than lifting it in the middle and disturbing your framing. However, when the camera is set to C, if you wait until after the last exposure in the set to release the shutter button, the camera will expose another set.

There are some limitations to the Leica bracketing system that don’t apply to the Nikon systems with which I am more familiar. You can’t choose the order in which the exposures are made. The steps can only be ½ shop, 1 stop, 2 stops, or 3 stops. You can’t bias the center value, except with the exposure compensation adjust. The choices for number of frames is 3 or 5. None of these impacts me in any important way.

Auto-bracketing is completely compatible with the self-timer, so you can leave your cable release at home if the camera is on a tripod.

After you set up auto bracketing, it will work as long as the camera is awake. Turning the camera off cancels it. I guess that’s OK, but I would prefer it to be sticky, perhaps with some indication that it’s engaged in the LED display. If the camera goes to sleep, that also cancels the bracketing. I don’t like that at all.

When you’re using auto-bracketing and setting the shutter manually, the shutter speed you pick is the middle one, although that’s not the speed of the first exposure. The order of exposures is fastest shutter speed first, working down to the slowest. But here’s something that’s passing strange; when you set the camera to A, the shutter speed displayed in the LED display is that of the first exposure, the fastest shutter speed of the whole series. Why the two modes work so differently is a mystery to me.

Like so many things on the M240 – and the M8 and M9 before it – there is much to love about the auto-bracketing system, a few things to dislike, and a couple of things that just make you want to scratch your head.

The Last Word

← Sharpness testing, part 2 Sharpness testing, part 3 →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.