• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Coastal Optical 60mm MTF in mixed IR & visible light

Coastal Optical 60mm MTF in mixed IR & visible light

January 20, 2015 JimK Leave a Comment

I mounted the Coastal Optical 60mm f/4 UV-Vis-IR Apo Macro lens (hereafter called the CO 60) to the LifePixel-modified Sony alpha 7. The LifePixel filter absorption curve is “Super Color”. I mounted a RRS L-plate, clipped it in landscape orientation into an Arca Swiss C1 head which was attached to a set of RRS TVC-44 legs.

I lit an Imatest SFRPlus target with a Paul Buff Einstein strobe. I set the ISO to 100, the shutter speed to 1/125 second, the shutter mode to 2-second self timer, programmed second curtain synch and electronic first curtain shutter (EFCS), focused wide open, and set the aperture to f/22. I set the strobe power to 80 watt-seconds. Using the variable power output on the Einstein to control the light level (80ws, 40 ws, 20 ws, 10ws, etc.), I made a series of sixteen exposures each at f/22, f/16,  f/11, f/8, f/5.6, and f/4. I developed the images in Lightroom 5.7.1 with sharpening and noise reduction turned off, exported them as TIFFs, and measured on-axis MTF50 in both the vertical and horizontal direction.

Here are the results:

 

a7IRCO60VMTFcor

a7IRCO60HMTF

 

The heavy lines are the average (mean, or mu) results. The light lines are the mean plus 3 standard deviation and mean minus three standard deviation line. If the MTF statistics are Gaussian, 99.7% of samples should lie between the two light lines.

You can see that there are not important variation in MTF at f/4 through f/11. You can also see that f/16 is entirely usable. IThe vertical and horizontal curves were produced from the same set of exposures.

Also note that 1400 cycles/picture height corresponds to 0.35 cycles/pixel. This lens is delivering really strong performance; the sensor is trying hard to keep up, but it’s more the limiting factor than the lens.

The strobes I used are balanced for D55, which is about daylight. However, I don’t know how well the strobes replicate a 5500 Kelvin black body in the IR region. The curves could vary with the amount of IR radiation.

One possible further experiment is to repeat the test with a visible-light-blocking filter in front of the lens.

I am glad that I don’t have to be scared of using the lens at f/11.

The Last Word

← IR photography with the Sony a7 & CO 60mm f/4 Coastal Optical 60mm f/4 MTF in IR →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.