• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / D800E shutter & mirror slap testing with an oscilloscope, part 2

D800E shutter & mirror slap testing with an oscilloscope, part 2

January 26, 2014 JimK Leave a Comment

Yesterday, I reported on camera vibration with the Zeiss 135mm f/2 APO Sonnar ZF.2 on a Nikon D800E in landscape orientation. See that post for details on the test setup. Today I show results with the camera in portrait orientation, flipped on its left side using the RRS L-bracket. The direction of the oscilloscope trace is still from left to right, vertical displacement means up-and-down movement. The shutter and the mirror of the D800E operates up and down when the camera is in landscape orientation, and side to side when it’s in portrait-shooting position. Therefore the traces show what is likely to be the smaller displacement direction, although the tripod and head used in this test has in the past shown an “ability” to turn vertical excitation into horizontal motion and vice versa.

First up, portrait with S mode at 20 milliseconds per division and 1/8 second using nearest neighbor:

P 20ms S

And using preserve details:

P 20ms S pd

We see a 7 or 8 pixel peak to peak oscillation at about 25 Hz, with a 100 Hz smaller oscillation that damps out after three or four cycles.

With the mirror up, and nearest neighbor:

P 20ms Mup

And with preserve details:

P 20ms Mup pd

The 25 Hz oscillation with the mirror operated normally is absent. There is a 3 or 4 pixel peak to peak resonance at about 40 Hz and a smaller one at about 100 Hz.

S shutter mode at 5 milliseconds per division and a shutter speed of 1/25 and nearest neighbor interpolation:

P 5ms S

And with preserve details interpolation:

P 5ms S pd

The first-curtain-closing slap is visible if you look really hard, but it’s tiny, probably because the shutter is fairly well damped, and the lens is so massive.

Portrait orientation and Mup shutter mode at 5 milliseconds per division and a shutter speed of 1/25 and nearest neighbor interpolation:

L 5ms Mup

And with preserve details interpolation:

L 5ms Mup pd

You can’t see the first curtain closing at all.

The RRS L-bracket and the D800E in portrait mode with shutter speeds of 1/250 or slower is not a tool set that will let you get anywhere near what the 135mm APO Sonnar is capable of delivering. I’d even worry about using the combination at higher shutter speeds.

The Last Word

← D800E shutter & mirror slap testing with an oscilloscope Comparing Nikon D800E and Sony a7R shutter shock →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.