• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Dark Current in CMOS Sensors: Where It Comes From, and How Cooling Helps

Dark Current in CMOS Sensors: Where It Comes From, and How Cooling Helps

May 12, 2025 JimK Leave a Comment

In low-light or long-exposure photography, one of the most persistent sources of unwanted signal is dark current: thermally generated electrons that accumulate even in total darkness. Unlike read noise, which is largely constant from frame to frame, dark current grows with exposure time and varies from pixel to pixel.

Dark current is the rate at which thermal energy liberates electrons in the absence of light. These electrons are indistinguishable from photoelectrons, so they add a false signal that increases with integration time and contributes additional shot noise.

Sources of Dark Current in CMOS Sensors

Dark current arises from several physical mechanisms:

  1. Thermal Generation in the Silicon Bulk
  • Electrons are thermally excited across the band gap from the valence band to the conduction band.
  • Dominant at moderate to high temperatures.
  • Has strong temperature dependence:
    I_dark ∝ T³ × exp(−E_g / kT)
    where E_g is the band gap (~1.1 eV for silicon), k is Boltzmann’s constant, and T is temperature in Kelvin.
  1. Generation at Surface States
  • Imperfections at the Si-SiO₂ interface, often in the transfer gate region or at pixel edges.
  • Surface traps can generate or release carriers.
  • More prominent in older processes or poorly passivated sensors.
  • Often shows strong pixel-to-pixel variation (a source of fixed pattern noise).
  1. Edge Leakage and STI Defects
  • Leakage currents along pixel boundaries or from shallow trench isolation (STI) defects.
  • Found in small-pixel sensors with aggressive layout geometries.
  • Often temperature-sensitive, but not always predictable.
  1. Hot Pixels
  • Pixels with unusually high dark current, often due to defects, dislocations, or contamination.
  • Can be stable or develop over time due to radiation damage or thermal cycling.
  • Often stand out more at higher temperatures and longer exposures.

Cooling primarily reduces thermal generation, which dominates bulk and surface dark current. Empirically:

  • Dark current halves for every 5–7°C drop in temperature.
  • This corresponds to the exponential dependence on 1/kT.
  • Cooling from 25°C to –25°C can reduce dark current by ~30×.

This doesn’t just reduce false signal — it also reduces dark current shot noise, which follows:

σ_dark = sqrt(I_dark × t)

So as I_dark drops, the noise drops as the square root of the reduction.

Limits of Cooling

  • Hot pixels may remain hot: Their leakage is often defect-driven, not thermally activated in the same way.
  • Surface trap behavior is complex: Some states have long time constants or can generate bursts.
  • Deep cooling (>–40°C) gives diminishing returns for most sensors unless you’re dealing with long integrations (e.g., astrophotography).

Best Practices

  • Use thermoelectric cooling (TEC) to drop sensor temperature to a stable setpoint.
  • Calibrate and subtract dark frames at each exposure time and temperature.
  • Monitor hot pixel behavior over time; some may worsen with sensor age or radiation.

Dark current is a thermal problem at its core, and that makes mitigation possible. Cooling is by far the most effective strategy for reducing it, offering exponential improvements in signal fidelity for long exposures. For scientific and astrophotographic work, managing dark current is essential to approaching the theoretical noise limits of your sensor.

The Last Word

← What cooling can, and can’t, do for CMOS read noise How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.