• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Direct feedback and learning

Direct feedback and learning

June 28, 2024 JimK 5 Comments

I was having a conversation on-line today about workshops. I was extolling their virtues for improving your photography, and the other person wasn’t buying it. They said that because of the instant feedback that modern digital cameras provide, you could be your own teacher at least as effectively as learning from someone else. We debated, and in the end agreed to disagree.

An hour later I had an on-line guitar lesson. My instructor pointed out two things that I was doing wrong that should be corrected. I hadn’t noticed either of them. So that’s a case where the instant feedback I was receiving by listening to myself play was insufficient. A few years ago, I was taking a course from John Sexton, and he was looking at my portfolio. He pulled up a print and said, “You used potassium ferricyanide on this, didn’t you?” I asked him how he knew. He said that it gave the highlights a faint yellow tinge. I had to look really hard, but I finally saw what he was talking about.

After my guitar lesson, I went to a physical therapy session. My physical therapist several times noticed that I wasn’t doing an exercise quite right, pointed that out, and gave be feedback when I tried to make it better.

Sometimes, the opinion of an expert can yield insights you can’t get all by yourself. Or, if you could eventually get there by yourself, you can get there a lot faster by listening to an expert.

Another thing to consider is bad habits. It’s better to find out you’re doing something wrong early, so you don’t ingrain the error into your practice.

The Last Word

← Your photograph looks like a painting? Hasselblad XCD 135/2.8 Summary →

Comments

  1. Christer Almqvist says

    June 29, 2024 at 3:01 am

    Made me think.

    Reply
  2. Bob says

    June 29, 2024 at 9:23 am

    Great points, thank you.

    Having said that, it’s really a question of `both and`, I think. Yes the instant feedback can be helpful, if we’re honest and critical enough. But even more useful is feedback from others, particularly if t they posses superior knowledge.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      June 29, 2024 at 9:36 am

      Yes. I certainly didn’t mean to exclude learning from experience.

      Reply
  3. Eric Brody says

    June 29, 2024 at 9:50 am

    Feedback from others can be quite helpful so long as one is aware of the source biases. Good teachers adapt their standards to the student. They will likely be more demanding of those whose skills are better and more tolerant of minor issues with those at a different level. Great teachers, such as John Sexton, from whom I’ve also taken workshops, seem to see things, both technical and artistic that the photographer misses because many of us are so in love with our own images. The ultimate comeback to a criticism with which one does not agree… “I like it that way!”
    As far as “instant” feedback is concerned, it takes me a while, sometimes several prints before I see problems with an image. This may sound unbelievable, but once I made a wide angle photo of the inside of a railway car, it was not until I had made a 13×20 print that I saw that I had left my camera pack in the image, blinders?

    Reply
  4. Ken Lee says

    June 29, 2024 at 1:25 pm

    We often see the parts we like and overlook the rest. Others see everything and give us instant feedback. We may reject that feedback, because at this point we’re still seeing only the parts we like.

    To discover the rest of the photograph, we may have to keep it out of sight until we’ve had a chance to “forgetaboutit”. At that point we can see it more as others do, and we might even ask ourselves “What was I even thinking?”.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.