• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Foveon Merrill color accuracy

Foveon Merrill color accuracy

December 12, 2023 JimK 4 Comments

I’ve been looking at ways to tame the excessive sharpening that Sigma Photo Pro introduces to images from the Merrill cameras, and I’ve discovered a really good workaround. During a discussion of that scheme, a reader suggested that I look at the Merrill colors. A long-time DPR member whose handle is xpatUSA provided me with the sensor spectral response and the hot mirror transmission spectra for the cameras, which are purportedly the same for all the Sigma Foveon cameras prior to the Quattro ones.

I reacquainted myself with a program I wrote several years ago to generate optimal compromise matrices, and fed it the Foveon spectral curves. Here’s what I got back:

 

A  Sensitivity Metamerism Index of 82. That’s not very impressive.  High accuracy consumer cameras score in the high 80’s and low nineties. Perfect is 100. Worried that I had gotten hung up on a local minimum, I tried the genetic algorithm with a population of half a million.

Not quite as good, but the GA isn’t great at ferreting out the local minima in detail.

Here’s what the optimization looked like:

I doubt if there’s a deep global minimum that the GA missed.

Compare that SMI to another camera:

 

Here’s as good as you can get with Gaussian raw channel spectral responses:

 

 

The Last Word

← Hasselblad XCD 90/2.5 V bokeh on X2D An attractive offer, spurned →

Comments

  1. Paul says

    December 12, 2023 at 5:07 pm

    I you have a responsibility to publish a caveat regarding your above Foveon input data stating clearly that it’s origin and manner in which it (data) was gathered cannot be verified for quality nor accuracy. Can you imagine during your professional years, a lab redoing your work without proper, verified data and then publishing findings that cast your original work in qluestion and with some dismissiveness?

    As you know the cutoff filters for these frequencies are very specific and expensive. Generally, only sensor and camera manufacturers use them. I believe the separation of the RGB channels is even more difficult with the Foveon polychromatic pixel.

    That said, I do not believe your experiment with xpat data is valid.

    Thank you for listening.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      December 12, 2023 at 5:43 pm

      If you have better spectral data, I’d love to see it.

      Reply
    • JimK says

      December 13, 2023 at 11:20 am

      See this:

      https://blog.kasson.com/the-last-word/foveon-merrill-color-accuracy-continued/

      Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Foveon Merrill color accuracy, continued - the last word says:
    December 13, 2023 at 1:13 pm

    […] Yesterday I published a post that took a set of Sigma Foveon silicon spectral responses and a hot mirror spectral transmi…. […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.