• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Lens adapter tolerance, part 2

Lens adapter tolerance, part 2

December 17, 2013 JimK 2 Comments

A few days ago, I wrote this post on lens adapter tolerance, saying that my two Novoflex and one Metabones adapters were all too short by way more than you’d think manufacturing tolerance would suggest.

A reader wrote to me of a communication with Novoflex in which they said that, in their case, the adapters were too short on purpose, so that lenses with out-of-tolerance focusing settings could be sure of focusing to infinity when mounted using a Novoflex adapter.

I can see why they would do that; they certainly don’t want a lot of people calling Customer Service to complain that their lenses won’t focus to infinity.

However, there are some problems that too short adapters cause in addition to relegating the distance scale on the lens to ornamental use.  Some lenses, particularly Leicas, use floating elements to compensate for errors that can occur as the lens in racked out to focus close. Those corrections only work the way the designer intended if the lens flange is the correct distance to the sensor.

Zoom lenses will not in general remain parfocal if their rear flange is not the correct distance from the sensor. That means that something focused on at one focal length won’t necessarily stay in focus as the lens is zoomed. I never trusted in parfocality anyway, so it’s no loss to me, but if you have counted on it, you won’t be able to once your lens is mounted on a too-short adapter.

One place where you really need parfocality is making movies.

The Last Word

← Design changes to mitigate shutter shock Adobe Flat Field & the a7R →

Comments

  1. Gerald Wong says

    April 29, 2015 at 11:27 am

    I bought 3 adaptor for my Contax/Yashica lenses to Sony Nex.
    All 3 are about .003″ too short. Made huge impact on the 28mm; not so much on the telephoto. Spent a week hand-machining alum shims, each one specificly matched to each lens. Now the pictures are sharp as they should be, and infinity settings are exactly right.

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. NEX adapters that are the right length | The Last Word says:
    December 5, 2015 at 7:24 am

    […] year or so ago, I wrote this post complaining that lens adapters were always too short. Then, in this post, I reported that, at least in the case of Novaflex, they were too short by design. A week or so […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.