• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Manually focusing the Fujifilm GFX 50S

Manually focusing the Fujifilm GFX 50S

April 27, 2017 JimK 18 Comments

This is the 51st in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here.

I am reading many complaints about photographers who are having difficulty in manually focusing the Fuji GFX, both with the native focus-by-wire lenses and adapted ones. I have developed what I think are highly accurate ways to focus the camera. I have touched on them in this post about GFX focusing in general, but the thrust of that piece was about autofocus.

Today I’m going to concentrate on manual focus, with the aim of guiding GFX users to satisfaction with their ability to focus accurately. Notice that I am not aiming for “delight”.

Let’s back up and talk about manual focusing for digital cameras in general. Early digital cameras were either modified film SLR bodies (thank you, Eastman Kodak) or scanning inserts for 4×5 view or press cameras (now called technical cameras). Manual focusing was no better and no worse than on the film cameras themselves. We used loupes on the ground glass of the view cameras, and that was only fairly successful; stopping down a lot covered up our errors, and the slow lenses we used didn’t have bad focus shift. For the film cameras, it was worse, since by that time the manual focusing aids formerly employed in film SLRs were being phased out on the mistaken theory that, thanks to autofocus, they were superfluous. Then came medium format SLRs, and manual focusing became a real problem.

Ten or more years ago, salvation appeared in the form of live view. Now we were back to peering at the back of the camera, only at a much smaller display than with a view camera. The image was right-side-up, but some of us still longed for dark cloths. There was one really good thing: we could magnify the image digitally, in some cases to a sensor pixel level. We could finally have high-resolution, sharp, manually focused digital images. Over the years, live view became ubiquitous on high-end DSLRs; it even appeared in medium format, with the arrival of CMOS to that size sensor.

Then came mirrorless, which put live view in the viewfinder. Because of that and IBIS, we finally had the ability to accurately focus manually with the camera handheld.

With mirrorless came a focusing aid called peaking, which added false color to the viewfinder in places where horizontal scans showed a lot of contrast. Most people used peaking when looking at a full frame image, where it proved to be useful for judging depth of field in some circumstances, but was too much of a blunt instrument for critically focusing. For that reason, focus peaking acquired a bad reputation among photographers who wanted sharp images.

GFX with peaking set to “Low”, focused on the distant trees. Notice how everything is lit up in red including the OOF foreground. Useless.

When magnified finders were good, as they were in the D810 (not the D800), the a7II, and the a7RII (and, even better, the a7R) they were good enough that you didn’t need to use peaking in magnified view, which reinforced the viewpoint that peaking was for people who just wanted to get close to the right focus.

Then, the GFX showed up. It had three focus magnification settings, easily controlled by a thumb wheel. Good. But the most magnified setting was too low for critical work. Not so good. And so people started saying that you can’t focus a GFX accurately. That would be true, if it weren’t for peaking.

Here’s the way that focus peaking and magnification interact. As you increase the magnification, you need more peaking sensitivity to light up the same parts of the image. Looked at another way, the peaking setting that’s right for a heavily magnified image is too sensitive for one with less magnification. Fuji has two peaking sensitivities in the GFX, not including off. They call them low and high. I call them high and higher, but for this post, we’ll stick to Fuji’s terminology.

What follows is my advice on how to focus the GFX with good-quality lenses with the camera on a tripod.

First, ignore the two lower settings for magnified view. You only care about full frame view and the most magnified one. Second, turn focus peaking on, and set it to something other than white; I like red, and I’ll assume you picked that for the rest of this piece. Set the lens to the taking aperture unless you’ve determined that focus shift isn’t going to be a problem. You can split the difference and, say, focus at f/4 and shoot at f/8 if you have determined that that’s safe. Unless your subject is very low in contrast, the peaking setting that Fuji calls high is going to be too high, so try the one they call low first.

Now focus on whatever you want. There are three things that can happen.

  • The first is that nothing lights up in red. In that unlikely case, increase the sensitivity to high, and try again.
  • The second is that too much of the image lights up for you to find the critical focus point. In that case, find a part of your subject that is lower in contrast. If you look hard, you can almost always find something suitable.
  • The third is that you’ve found a part of the subject where there’s a little red at the focus point, but not too much. Even better is a part of the subject that shows little white dots just off the focus point, and tinges of red right at it. That makes it really easy to focus.

That’s pretty much it. I encourage you to experiment. The camera is good enough and sharp enough that it deserves to be focused accurately.

Max magnification, peaking set to red and low. Image is OOF. Note just a few white dots.
Max magnification, peaking set to red and low. Not in focus. Mixed white and red dots.
Max magnification, peaking set to red and low. In focus. Lots of red. This is an example of an area of the subject with marginally too much contrast.

 

Max magnification, peaking set to red and low. Switching to a lower-contrast part of the subject. Out of focus.

 

Max magnification, peaking set to red and low. In focus. The transition to this many red dots is quite abrupt. Note that you are now focusing on a part of the subject that you wouldn’t use if it weren’t for peaking.

 

There’s another trick to peaking. It’s based on horizontal scan lines, so, when faced with a subject with vertically or horizontally oriented structure (or anything in between), you can vary the camera’s peaking sensitivity by rotating it. If the lines in the target line up vertically in the (landscape oriented) finder, you’re going to have the greatest peaking sensitivity, if they line up horizontally, your sensitivity will be the least.

Up above I said that “delight” was an unrealistic expectation for the GFX focusing experience. I think it’s unrealistic for any manual focusing experience today, save the Betterlight Super 6K, the special focusing target, and the app set to focus mode (and even that has a ugly side in that you need to put the focusing target in the scene to make it work, and it won’t work if the focusing target is far away).

What would make the GFX a delight to focus? Here’s my list:

  • More magnification at all three settings.
  • Continuously variable peaking sensitivity adjustable with a thumbwheel, going much lower than the present “low” setting.

 

 

The Last Word

← a9 drops to 12-bit precision in continuous mode? Fujifill GFX 50S — summary →

Comments

  1. Chris Golson says

    April 27, 2017 at 5:08 pm

    Thankyou, very helpful!
    Many of your posts have been helpful.
    Still waiting on my fuji lens so I’ve been struggling with my nikom lenses to accurate focus.
    Coming from a d810 and ovf, I find the gfx very different and not as easy.
    Have you found any way to change the shutter dial on the back from 1/3 to 1/2 or 1? I can’t seem to get the exposure meter to react as senstively, as I can my d810. It jumps in increments as I massively swipe the back dial!

    Reply
    • JimK says

      April 27, 2017 at 8:51 pm

      I don’t use the exposure meter in manual mode. I haven’t talked about this in the blog yet, but one of the things that I think is so great about the GFX is having a color livve histogram available at the touch of a button. i don’t know of any other camera that has this — I’ve never used the APS-C Fujis. It is so much better than an exposure meter for setting manual exposure. Sure, it’s not a real raw histogram, but it’s pretty darned good.

      The dial adjusts shutter speeds in 1/3 stop increments. If you want whole stop increments, just use the big dial on the top of the camera.

      Reply
  2. Kirk Thompson says

    July 11, 2017 at 1:49 pm

    Thank you! Just one thing to add, perhaps near the beginning this post:

    Where’s Peaking in the menu listing? It doesn’t appear in the tables at the front of the manual.

    Peaking is to be found under MF > MF Assist. This isn’t intuitive, because Focus Assist usually refers to a light beam that aids focusing.

    This is one of the little problems that arises because there’s no index in the manual.

    The other getting-started problems I’ve had trouble with are the eccentric Fuji vocabulary, with Photometry meaning Metering Mode, and ISO disguised as Sensitivity. Oh – and M on the upper left rear dial means Manual, not Movie!

    Reply
    • JimK says

      July 11, 2017 at 2:28 pm

      I agree about the index. I didn’t have any trouble with the Fuji terminology for peaking, because there is no place for a light source on the front of the camera. I didn’t have any trouble with Photometry, either, since it means exactly what it sounds like it would mean, although I did and do find it a little quaint. And I think sensitivity is a much better name than ISO. In my book, gain would be even better. And I never even considered that M on a dial with S and C as the other positions, could possible be movie.

      Reply
  3. Michael says

    January 29, 2018 at 12:47 pm

    Thanks for the piece Jim!

    Re: “More magnification at all three settings, culminating with something as good as the a7R’s maximum magnification”

    Not sure if I follow this: the a7R3 has a maximum magnification of 12x (not sure if a7R offers higher?), which is lower than the max GFX offers (16x).

    Reply
    • JimK says

      January 29, 2018 at 1:17 pm

      I stand corrected, and I’ll make the change. Not sure why the a7R was easier to focus without peaking.

      Reply
      • Michael Fang says

        October 2, 2018 at 10:06 pm

        A probably dated reply, but I did find the magnified view on GFX is lagging behind the a7R3.

        In fact, of all the recent cameras I’ve used, the live view on 5DsR provided the best magnified manual focusing experience, it was just so easy to see when things are in focus. Also the 5DsR provides more fine grained control when moving the focus point.

        GFX’s magnified view OTOH, just doesn’t seem to have shallow enough DOF to reach focus quickly.

        That leaves me wonder, is it because the GFX doesn’t open up the aperture automatically when focusing (like DSLRs)?

        Reply
        • JimK says

          October 3, 2018 at 7:29 am

          GFX’s magnified view OTOH, just doesn’t seem to have shallow enough DOF to reach focus quickly.

          You are correct, without peaking. My point is that, with peaking, it is fast and accurate.

          Reply
  4. Rich says

    November 22, 2021 at 11:43 pm

    Thank you for this informative post. I’ve had exactly your thoughts as I moved through the Sony range, but it’s always reassuring to read it through someone else as I set up my shiny new GFX with those old peaking friends!

    Reply
  5. John S says

    August 6, 2022 at 8:35 pm

    Would all this apply to the 50s II as well?

    Reply
    • JimK says

      August 6, 2022 at 9:04 pm

      Yes, indeed.

      Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Fujifilm GFX 50S Roundup | Fuji Addict says:
    April 28, 2017 at 11:24 am

    […] The Last Word – Manually focusing the Fujifilm GFX 50S […]

    Reply
  2. Fujifill GFX 50S — summary says:
    May 8, 2017 at 10:11 am

    […] Once you realize that the peaking is overactive and the max magnification is anemic and you figure out how to get around all that, it’s pretty good. Not great, for sure, but good enough to get consistent focusing that’s […]

    Reply
  3. Leica 135/3.4 Apo-Telyt-M on Fuji GFX 50S says:
    May 12, 2017 at 2:55 pm

    […] All images developed in Lightroom with default settings except for white balance set to Daylight. All crops focused at the taking aperture. I made three sets of images, and picked the sharpest. At any given f-stop, the images were so close in sharpness that I might just as well have done the picking by throwing darts. I think I’ve got manual focusing dialed in on the GFX. […]

    Reply
  4. Two Leica R-mount 180s on Fujifilm GFX 50S says:
    May 13, 2017 at 11:58 am

    […] were so close in sharpness that I might just as well have done the picking by throwing darts. I think I’ve got manual focusing dialed in on the GFX. The Leica R-mount lenses are much more pleasant to focus then the M-mount ones because of the […]

    Reply
  5. Leica 90/2 Summicron-M ASPH on Fuji GFX 50S says:
    May 13, 2017 at 12:06 pm

    […] All images developed in Lightroom with default settings except for white balance set to Daylight. All crops focused at the taking aperture. I made three sets of images, and picked the sharpest. At any given f-stop, the images were so close in sharpness that I might just as well have done the picking by throwing darts. I think I’ve got manual focusing dialed in on the GFX. […]

    Reply
  6. Fujifilm GFX 50S focusing — summary to date says:
    February 6, 2018 at 8:41 am

    […] All the things above conspire to make critical manual focusing fairly good (but far from great) with adapted helicoid lenses and barely acceptable with the native focus by wire lenses. I’d put the focusing with adapted lenses about the same as the D810 (that only applies if you turn peaking on in the GFX, though — the D810 doesn’t have peaking). With the two native lenses I’ve tried — the 63 and 120 macro — the focusing experience is better than the D800, but short of the D810. In no case does the GFX provide manual focusing that’s the equal of the a7R, or even the a7RII. The standard of focusing tolerance is not the same across those cameras, since the GFX is capable of so much greater sharpness when the image is in focus; I’m being harder on the GFX because it can do so much more, and thus the consequences of a small focusing error are greater. Here is a focusing strategy that works well with the GFX. […]

    Reply
  7. Dealing with focus shift with native lenses on the Fuji GFX says:
    February 2, 2019 at 1:01 pm

    […] First off, for any of this to be useful to you, you’ll have to know how to manually focus native lenses stopped down. Second, you’ll have to know an effective technique for precise manual focusing. […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.