• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / More BetterLight testing with the ISO 12233 target

More BetterLight testing with the ISO 12233 target

February 10, 2014 JimK Leave a Comment

There is a focusing aid in the BetterLight software. It allows you to position the sensor column anywhere on the image, read out part of it, and display any channel as a graph. If you’re looking at a high-contrast part of the subject, you can focus by finding the lens positon that maximizes contrast. In addition, assuming that the area that you’re looking at is all in the plane of focus, it’s child’s play to find the aperture that delivers the sharpest image from whatever lens you’re using; just move the aperture lever back and forth until you get maximum contrast. With the 120mm f/5.6 AM ED Nikkor, at the distance that I’m using, f/11 is the magic f-stop.

With more accurate focusing, I was able to get a more contrasty view of the ISO 12233 target. It’s really pretty spectacular. Total ISO  12233 target height is 570 pixels, so one line pair per pixel pair occurs between the lines labeled “5” and those labeled “6”.

Betterlight_00248 cr

So, once you get your head around operating in the field in tethered mode, what’s not to like about the BetterLight back for the firehouse project?

Time, that’s what.

I went back and looked at the exposures for the pictures that I’ve done so far in this series. An average exposure seems to be f/16 for 2 seconds at ISO 100. The lowest ISO for the BetterLight back is 200, and I’d be using f/11 most of the time, so that would give me half a second. But wait! That’s half a second per column, and there are 8000 columns. We’re talking a 4000 second – over an hour – exposure time!

The BetterLight back has a limitation — or is it a feature — that saves me from some of that masochism. The longest exposure time is 1/8 second. I’d have to crank the ISO up to 800, and then I’d have 16-minute exposures.

One, with that long an exposure, my productivity would suck. Two, what are the odds that I’ll be able to keep people from walking someplace where their reflections would be visible for that long? Three, the light is going to change during the exposure. Four, forget focus stacking; even if I had the patience, I’ll never get the light anywhere near the same from image to image.

The Last Word

← Testing a scanning camera with the ISO 12233 target Sony a7 shutter shock testing with the ISO 12233 target →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.