• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / More slit scan experiments — dealing with vertical striping

More slit scan experiments — dealing with vertical striping

November 26, 2016 JimK 3 Comments

This post is part of a series about some experiments I’m doing combining space and time in slit scan photographs. The series starts here.

Sometimes with the slit scan images that I’m doing, the pattern of cloud shadows on the hills changes very rapidly, creating vertical striping patterns that are visually odd (in a bad way, not odd in a good way like the rest of the image) and distracting. 

Here’s an example, with a 22-pixel wide slit, moved in 2-pixel increments with each new exposure:

6-slid-ovr20-start-fwd-2500-2px 

Look in the lower left corner. See the stripes?

One way to reduce the striping is to make the slit wider. Here are the same exposures processed with a 202-pixel-wide slit:

6-slid-ovr200-start-fwd-2500-2px

Ignore the gradients on the left and right. They are the width of the slit, and are the result of the way I wrote the code. I can probably figure out a way to make them go away, but for now I’m cropping.

Well, the stripes are pretty much gone, but the clouds are way too soft. As I said in yesterday’s post, making the slit wider doesn’t affect the sharpness of static objects, so the trees and hills are sharp.

What to do? Let’s use a little of each one, and do some cropping and burning-in:

6-slid-ovr20-and-200-start-fwd-2500-2px

 

That’s pretty nice, I think. I’ll be using this technique going forward.

As a side benefit, the non-pattern read noise and the photon noise in the hills is now down by the square root of 202 over that of a single exposure. That’s a factor of more than 14.

The Last Word

← More slit scan experiments — ameliorating shadow noise Sony a7RII long exposure spatial filtering with FW 3.30 →

Comments

  1. Lynn Allan says

    November 26, 2016 at 3:32 pm

    If it would be consistent with your approach , perhaps you could make a composite with the clouds from the slit scan, and the ground from a single image?

    But I claim no expertise or significant experience with PS masking.

    Reply
    • Jim says

      November 26, 2016 at 3:44 pm

      This is a lot better, because the time matches top to bottom, and I get the noise reduction, too.

      Reply
  2. CarVac says

    November 26, 2016 at 9:47 pm

    I really liked the striping.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.