• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / NEX-7 — manual focusing experiments

NEX-7 — manual focusing experiments

January 22, 2012 JimK Leave a Comment

Chastened by my inability to achieve consistently accurate autofocus touchup with the Zeiss Sonnar f/1.8 on the Sony NEX-7, I made a series of 50 photographs using manual focus and analyzed the results. The only important difference between the focusing experience using autofocus override and that using manual focus on the NEX-7 with Sony lenses is that using manual focus allows you to focus using 12x magnification. I found it easier to focus the Sony/Zeiss lens with the increased magnification, but it was still difficult to get the focus point exactly where I wanted it.

As expected, the greater magnification increased my probability of success with manual focus, raising it from about a one third chance of getting a sharp image using 6x magnification to a 92% chance of getting a sharp image with 12x magnification.

Then I took the Sony/Zeiss lens off the camera, put on the Leica 24 mm f/3.8 Elmar, and made 50 more pictures. Every one was sharp. Not only that, I was able to achieve precise focus much more quickly than with the Sony/Zeiss lens, and the focusing operation was not at all stressful.

As I said in the previous post, I think the source of the less accurate, less pleasurable focusing experience on the Sony/Zeiss lens is the focusing algorithms that are built into the NEX-7. Having made so many exposures back-to-back with a lens with a normal focusing mount and the Sony/Zeiss 85 mm, I think I have some insight into what the focusing algorithm in the NEX-7 is doing. It seems that when you rotate the focusing ring rapidly, the ratio of lens movement to ring movement is higher than when you rotate the ring slowly. This may be a deliberate move on the part of the Sony engineers, who may be thinking that when you’re moving the ring slowly, you want the lens to go and some fine-tuning mode where it takes a lot of movement of the ring to get the lens to move a little bit. Maybe that would be a good thing for somebody who hasn’t spent much time using a real focusing helicoid, but it drives me nuts. I’ve spent fifty years learning how to focus really well, and I don’t want anybody to change the rules on me.

Now, let’s take a look at the flip side of NEX-7 manual focusing. With the Elmar, a wide angle lens, I got 50 successive perfectly focused pictures. I couldn’t do that with a loupe and a large-format camera. I couldn’t do that with a split-image or microprism insert in the middle of a SLR ground glass. I couldn’t come close to it with manual focusing on a modern DSLR. With the right cam in the right rangefinder camera (the odds of that aren’t good) I might be able to do it, but if the camera and the lens aren’t perfectly matched, I’d get no sharp pictures. This is spectacular focusing accuracy that NEX-7 users can rely on. It’s a major step forward.

 

The Last Word

← NEX-7 — more Zeiss 24mm autofocus testing NEX-7 — purple corners compared to NEX-5 →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.