• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / NEX adapters that are the right length

NEX adapters that are the right length

February 25, 2015 JimK 4 Comments

A year or so ago, I wrote this post complaining that lens adapters were always too short. Then, in this post, I reported that, at least in the case of Novaflex, they were too short by design. A week or so ago, in this post, I told you all that I had received two adapters from Kipon, and that they were the right length.

I have since received three more Kipon adapters for Sony NEX/alpha 7 cameras, for a total of five:

  • one for Nikon S lenses
  • two for Leica R lenses
  • one for Leica M lenses
  • one for Nikon F lenses.

All of them are the right length, based on testing with many lenses and two cameras, to the following criteria:

  • All lenses can focus to infinity.
  • When all lenses are focused to infinity, the distance indicator on the lens is close to the infinity marker on the rotating barrel.

In addition, the Kipon adapters appear to be well made, and fit tightly, but without excessive torque required, at both the camera and the lens end. They have a raised red plastic bump on the camera side — similar to the one on Leica M lenses — so that you can bayonet the lens in by feel alone.

They’re not that easy to find, but if you do a search on Amazon you’ll find some. I got mine from a camera store in Japan, and the service has been fine. As a bonus, they are substantially cheaper than the Novoflex adapters.

[Added 12/2015: Adorama now retails Kipon adapters in the US.]

The Last Word

← How much do you do in post? D810 live view’s effect on dark-field noise, longer exposures →

Comments

  1. FAS says

    February 25, 2015 at 6:41 am

    Good to know. I’ve just bought my 2nd Novoflex, it seems that the third one will be a Kipon.
    Have you performed any test on planarity? (ie. simmetrical sharpness at both sides, especially with wide-angles…)

    Reply
  2. Jean Pierre says

    February 25, 2015 at 10:53 am

    Thanks Jim, it is not easy to find a good adapter! On the web you can find so much and even wrong one. I will take an eye of Kipon, when need one.

    Reply
  3. NicoG says

    March 2, 2015 at 8:01 pm

    Thanks a lot for this informative post. Let us know the outcome!

    FYI, I have a metabones and a noname adaptor for Minolta MD/MC mount lens … In the end, the metabones has the infinity spot on with part of my MD lens. But my MC lens do not reach the infinite with the metabones and results with this conbination are not at their best (notably for wide angle wide open). For these old MC lens I have to use the noname adapter which go past the infinite but results are better.

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Kipon vs Voitlander leica/sony adaptor and focus question - The GetDPI Photography Forums says:
    April 1, 2015 at 6:30 pm

    […] focus correctly at the infinity marking because the adaptor is slightly longer than the novoflex NEX adapters that are the right length | The Last Word Thanx […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.