• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Nikon 12-bit raw’s effect on shadow detail

Nikon 12-bit raw’s effect on shadow detail

January 31, 2015 JimK 9 Comments

A couple of days ago, I looked at the visual  shadow and dynamic range effects of the Sony alpha 7 shutter modes that reduce the bit depth from 13 to 12 bits. In the case of the Sonys, the loss in bit depth is accompanied by an increase in read noise that results in visible shadow impairment at ISO 100 when the shadows get a 5-stop push in Lightroom, and a little at ISO 200 when the shadows get a four-stop bump.  At ISO 400 shadows with a five stop push are marginally affected.

Contemporary Nikons normally write 14-bit losslessly compressed raw files, but the camera has a mode that changes the bit depth to 12 bits, presumably with no increase in read noise save the quantizing component. Will the affect shadow detail?

I put a Sigma 50mm f/1.4 Art lens on a D810, mounted the camera to the RRS  L-bracket, the bracket to an Arca-Swiss C1 head, the head to a RRS tripod, aimed the camera at the bookcase I usually use for this test. I focused wide open with live view. I set the camera for 14-bit raw.  I set the f-stop to f/5.6, the shutter to 1/40 second, the ISO to 2000, the shutter to mirror up with a 3-second delay, and made an exposure. Varying nothing but the ISO setting, I made five more exposures at ISO 1000, 500, 250, 125, and 64.

Then I set the camera for 12-bit raw and repeated the series.

I developed the images in Lightroom 5.7.1 with default settings except for turning off sharpening and noise reduction. Then I set the Exposure control on the ISO 64 images to  +5, the Exposure control on the ISO 125 image to  +4, the Exposure control on the ISO 250 image to +3, the Exposure control on the ISO 500 image to  +2, the Exposure control on the ISO 1000 image to  +1, and didn’t adjust the Exposure of the ISO 2000 image.

Here’s the overall scene:

_8104771

 

Here’s the five-stop underexposed image before the push:

_8104776-2

I cropped the images and magnified them by a factor of two.

Here are the images with the five stop push:

 

ISO 64, 14 bits
ISO 64, 14 bits
ISO 64, 12 bits
ISO 64, 12 bits

The differences are minor.

With a four-stop push:

ISO 125, 12 bits
ISO 125, 12 bits
ISO 125, 14 bits
ISO 125, 14 bits

The differences are even less.

Nikon 12 bit lossless raw doesn’t save a ton of space, but it is pretty gentle on the image quality.

The Last Word

← Pictures: 28mm f/1.4 Nikkor-D on IR a7 50mm f/2 Nikkor-H, 50mm f/1.4 Summilux on alpha 7II →

Comments

  1. Eric says

    January 31, 2015 at 1:23 am

    and some people say why we dont have 16bit in 35 format DSLRs as MF cameras have? Seems we dont need it at all

    Reply
    • MikaFoxx says

      March 17, 2025 at 9:48 am

      I think Jim Kasson could agree that on the GFX it’s also essentially useless. Especially with more pixel density the individual dynamic range of a pixel is more limited, yet the 50mp GFX only use 14 bits despite the larger pixels with a lower noise floor. Turns out when you’re counting a couple dozen photons and some of the read noise, extra bits just give you extra bits of noise resolution.

      Reply
  2. Jean Pierre says

    January 31, 2015 at 4:41 am

    Thanks Jim, nice to know… and how well underexposer works till -4EV. I did not expected it!!!

    Reply
  3. HF says

    January 31, 2015 at 1:42 pm

    Thanks for the test, confirms my findings. Great work!

    Reply
  4. Davide says

    February 18, 2015 at 8:52 pm

    Isn’t there more than shadow noise (and dynamic range) in image quality? I mean, how are affetted by the 12bit format color depths and accuracy (and the ability to recover white bilance and tone)?
    My .02

    Reply
  5. Joseph says

    March 13, 2015 at 11:03 am

    I would love to see how/if highlight retention is affected by 12bit vs 14 bit. I’m suprised that 14bit’s shadows do show different noise characteristics.

    Thank you for your test!

    Reply
    • Jim says

      March 13, 2015 at 12:06 pm

      The highlights are virtually unaffected by the bit depth. The photon noise swamps out any differences.

      Reply
  6. HF says

    August 4, 2015 at 9:06 am

    I am just wondering. How much of the measured difference presented in your other post can be seen here due to the 8 bits of our monitor?

    Reply
    • Jim says

      August 4, 2015 at 9:10 am

      Pretty much all of it, assuming your monitor is calibrated and uses a gamma of 2.2. Another question would be how much is encoded in the 8-bit sRGB JPEG file? The answer to that is a little over 11 bits, because of the sRGB tone curve.

      If you look at the pushed images, you can see more of what’s going on in the shadows, since the push raises the effective file bit depth by one bit per stop.

      Jim

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.