• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Nikon 300mm f/4E PF ED VR on Nikon D810

Nikon 300mm f/4E PF ED VR on Nikon D810

April 29, 2015 JimK 2 Comments

You’ve probably read about this lens. 300mm f/4, and smaller and lighter than you can believe until you hold it in your hand. Credit a phase Fresnel — that’s what the PF in the alphabet-soup lens name stands for — element for the tiny size and feathery weight. Optical stabilization, of course.

How good is it? I set up on my usual normal and tele subject, and made a series of exposures with a D810 mounted on an Arca Swiss D4 head on RRS legs, with EFCS on.

f/4
f/4
f/5.6
f/5.6
f/8
f/8
f/11
f/11
f/16
f/16

There’s a little vignetting wide open. It’s mostly gone at f/5.6, and really gone at f/8.

When the lens is this long and there’s a real life, non-flat subject, focusing on the center and checking the corner won’t cut it because there’s not enough depth of field. So I first focused on the center. It was a lot easier if I turned on the VR (optical stabilization), although once I forget to turn it off for the aperture series and had to redo it.

Here are 300% enlargements of 1:1 crops on the leaves that I focused on.

 

f/4
f/4
f/5.6
f/5.6
f/8
f/8
f/11
f/11
f/16
f/16

It’s pretty startling how good this lens is wide open. But lots of lenses are good in the center. Let’s take a look at the upper left corner.

f/4
f/4
f/5.6
f/5.6
f/8
f/8
f/11
f/11
f/16
f/16

Again, the results are darned impressive. Best results are at f/8. There’s some purple fringing on the left of the leaves at all apertures. Lr is good at removing this. There’s some green fringing on the right of the leaves at all apertures. I didn’t expect it to be, but Lr is also quite good at removing this.

Two things that I worry about with a lens design like this: bokeh and flare. I’ll deal with the former in a later post, but today I’ll show you a series of progressively more defocused images to get an idea of the bokeh.

_8105424

_8105425

_8105426

_8105427

_8105428

Note the now-immortalized  bug that flew into the frame in the last picture.

Looks good to me.

How about OOF bright foreground objects?

_8105421

_8105422

No problem. I zoomed in and poked around on all these images, and couldn’t find anything wrong.

I did find something odd in an aperture series that I made where I forgot to turn the VR off:

_8105430

See the double images? I guess that’s why they tell you to turn off VR when you use the camera on a tripod.

The Last Word

← Spatial filtering of raw images by Sony a7S, a7II Nikon 300mm f/4E PF ED VR, Leica 280/4 Apo-Telyt-R →

Comments

  1. Pieter Kers says

    August 21, 2016 at 7:52 am

    Hello Jim Kasson,
    I just bought the 300PF and am impressed with it.
    You could do a study on the VR that is NOT working on the d810.
    But, if you uses it with the electronic shutter on the D810 you can have hand held sharpness @1/40 sec without much problem.
    For some images this is no solution of course…
    and indeed on a tripod best sharpness is obtained with VR off.
    greetings, Pieter Kers

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Is f/4 is the new f/2.8? | The Last Word says:
    December 1, 2015 at 5:48 pm

    […] combination to a Nikon kit that was more than twice as heavy, though one stop faster. Last spring I tested the Nikon 300mm f/4 phase Fresnel lens, and found it delightfully small and light, and not a bad performer. I didn’t compare it to the […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.