• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Nikon D5 — high ISO push processing

Nikon D5 — high ISO push processing

April 3, 2016 JimK Leave a Comment

This is part of a series of posts about the Nikon D5. The series starts here.

OK, back to the bookcase, this time to look at the effects of pushing in post processing and in the camera at high ISOs. I made a series of images at 3200 with successively reduced exposures and pushed them back up the same amount in post, Then I made a set at the same exposures, but increased the ISO setting in the camera as I went.

Here’s the setup:

  • Camera on tripod
  • Nikon 24/1.4 lens set to f/8 (stopped down so I could do the big pushes without turning off EFCS).
  • Base shutter speed 1/15 seconds for ISO 3200 shots, equivalently faster for higher ISOs.
  • ISO 3200 for the pushed posts, ISO 3200, 6400, 12800, 25600, 51200, 102400 for the unpushed ones.
  • EFCS
  • Shutter delay = 3 seconds
  • Liveview focusing
  • Developed with Lr 2015.5
  • Default settings except for below
  • Sharpening off
  • Noise reduction off
  • WB to the normal exposure, and applied that to all others

Here’s the overall scene:

_D500970

Here are a series of 200% crops:

ISO 3200, no push
ISO 3200, no push
ISO 6400, no push
ISO 6400, no push
ISO 3200, 1 stop push
ISO 3200, 1 stop push
ISO 12800, no push
ISO 12800, no push
ISO 3200, 2 stop push
ISO 3200, 2 stop push
ISO 25600, no push
ISO 25600, no push
ISO 3200, 3 stop push
ISO 3200, 3 stop push
ISO 51600, no push
ISO 51200, no push
ISO 3200, 4 stop push
ISO 3200, 4 stop push
ISO 102120, no push
ISO 102400, no push
ISO 3200, 5 stop push
ISO 3200, 5 stop push

Looks like pushing in the camera is better even up at ISO 3200. That’s what the read noise curves indicated, and that’s what happens in real life.

The Last Word

← Nikon D5 — photographic dynamic range Nikon D5 — ultra-high ISO push processing →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.