• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Nikon D5 — PRNU

Nikon D5 — PRNU

March 31, 2016 JimK 3 Comments

This is part of a series of posts about the Nikon D5. The series starts here.

Normally I don’t have much trouble measuring the pixel response non-uniformity (PRNU) of a camera. Set it up aimed at a white target. Light the target with a pair of LED panels set to 5000K. Add an optional 30CC magenta filter to even up the raw color planes (I used on this time), Defocus the lens; I just put the target a meter away and set the lens to infinity. Stop it down far enough to get fairly even sensor illumination. Set the shutter speed for an average exposure about a stop below clipping. Set up an intervalometer and make 128 exposures one second apart.

I converted all the images to DNG format with Adobe DNG converter 9.5 which supports the D5, and — hallelujah! — finally properly supports 4K displays under Windows. Then I turned the Matlab PRNU program loose on them. It calls DCRAW to decode each color plane of each image, crops as requested, and averages all the images, keeping track of some stats as it goes. The stat that we’re interested in is the standard deviation of the cropped  averaged image after equalization with a 99×99 kernel designed to minimize errors due to light falloff or lighting deviations from flatness.

That’s where the problems started.

Normally i do this testing soon after I have received the camera, because dust counts as a non-uniformity. Normally there’s not much dust on a brand new camera, and things go swimmingly. Not this time. My D5 has a lot of dust.

I rewrote the code so that it didn’t just blindly crop the image around the center of the frame; it cropped wherever I told it to. Then I moved around the image until I found a section without any significant dust, and told Matlab to do its magic.

Here’s what I got:

D5 PRNU

You can see all of the raw channels approaching an asymptote of slightly under 0.2%. This is a negligible amount of PRNU.

With modern cameras, more interesting than how much PRNU there is, is what it looks like. Here are 600×600 crops that are relatively  free from dust, equalized as above for lighting, and then stretched in luminance to show as much detail as possible.

Red
Red
Blue
Blue

 

Green !
Green !

This is about as benign as these things get.

The Last Word

← Nikon D5 — control layout Sloof Lirpa iPad accessories →

Comments

  1. Lynn Allan says

    April 1, 2016 at 7:56 am

    Well, the big 64 hundred $$$ question … what do images at highest ISO look like … ISO 3280000?

    Reply
    • Jim says

      April 1, 2016 at 8:30 am

      In a word, awful. But it’s like the dancing bear; you don’t talk about how well it dances, the fact that it can dance at all is enough.

      Reply
  2. Lynn Allan says

    April 3, 2016 at 3:16 pm

    I did look at the “Studio Scene” provided by DPR, and it agrees with your evaluation.
    http://www.dpreview.com/news/0715893019/nikon-d5-studio-scene-comparison-published

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.