• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Noise vs resolution — part 5

Noise vs resolution — part 5

January 26, 2012 JimK 2 Comments

I have exciting news. At least, it’s exciting to me. Your reaction may be, “Kasson, you really need to get out more.” Anyway, after many unsuccessful attempts, detailed in the previous posts, to tame the NEX-7 high-ISO noise by reducing the resolution of the image, I finally found something that works.

Here’s the recipe. Go into Lightroom or your favorite raw converter (I’ve only used Lightroom, but the technique should work in any other raw converter) and open up the noise controls. Get rid of all, or almost all, the visable noise. Be aggressive. Let the detail suffer a bit. Then resize the image downwards. I used Perfect Resize with the default control settings.

Using this approach, I resized NEX-5 and -7 images made at ISO 3200 from their original sizes to the 2784 x 1848 DX resolution of the reference Nikon D3s, and got lower noise and better details!

The crop of the NEX-7 image looks like this:

The crop of the NEX-5 image looks like this:

The crop of the reference D3s image. very lightly touched up with Lightroom noise reduction, because it’s so clean to begin with:

 

The Last Word

← Noise vs resolution — part 4 Noise vs resolution — part 6 →

Comments

  1. Max says

    March 30, 2012 at 6:49 pm

    Now this… this is very interesting for me. Thank you for lighting up a worry I have had for a bit. I am selling up my 5D2 gear in favor of NEX’s because of the size and shooting style. You have defitively explored the nex 7 in depth and I thank you for the efforts in exploring and publishing your results. I can now happily get rid of all my canon gear.

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. anyone upgraded from NEX 5n to NEX 7? says:
    March 5, 2012 at 6:29 am

    […] image quality degradation. You can have a go at this blog made by kasson on noise and resolution. Noise vs resolution — part 5 | The Last Word The ergonomics and the tri-navi system of the 7 will blow the 5n away. The built in EVF at the […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.