• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Other people’s blind spots

Other people’s blind spots

December 6, 2008 JimK Leave a Comment

It’s bad enough that you get trapped by your own blind spots, but it gets worse: it’s all too easy to become the victim of somebody else’s.

A couple of months ago, I suggested that workshops were a good way to see how other people do things, and perhaps discover the existence of mental door that you’d closed long ago. That’s the upside. If you’re not careful, you could easily claim as your own the blind spots of your teacher or of your fellow students.

Why is it so easy to absorb a teacher’s blind spots?

  • They are an authority, so there’s a tendency to think they have the answers.
  • They are experts, so they have convincing explanations as to why doing things the way they have settled on is right, and doing things in some other way is wrong. Remember what I said last month: the more expert you are, the harder it is to see your blind spots. It’s also easier to pass those blind spots along to others.
  • Trying things out takes time and energy, and much of photographic experimentation has little artistic content, so it’s not what most of us like to do. Thus, there’s a great temptation to save time by taking someone else’s word for something. Twenty-five or thirty years ago, the Zone System was a component of many workshops. Although doing your own testing was the cornerstone of the system, I was always amazed by the number of students who tried to bypass all that work and just wanted the instructor to tell them the “right” film speeds, developer dilutions, and development times.
  • It takes time and energy to question everything that you hear, and sometimes it feels like being negative.
  • In a group setting, there’s often a fear of asking questions that might be perceived as dumb, or of expressing skepticism.

Sometimes in a workshop you can latch onto a blind spot that the teacher doesn’t even have. About twenty years ago, I attended a workshop taught by one of the masters of West-Coast, large-format, black and white landscape photography.  On the last day, we took a tour of his darkroom. On a high shelf, I noticed an immense bottle of potassium ferricyanide. I pointed at it and said, “I thought you said you never bleach prints.”  He harrumphed a bit, and replied that he sometimes bleached negatives. I didn’t argue, but instead did a little mental calculation to figure out how many negatives you could bleach with that much ferricyanide, and decided to keep on bleaching my prints if that’s what the image needed.

What to do? As with your own blind spots, it’s not easy. You can’t let a fear of absorbing some else’s blind spots paralyze you. You go to workshops to learn things, and learning to do things one way means not doing it several other possible ways. You want to take away knowledge of the truth, but not “knowledge” of things that aren’t true. A little healthy skepticism helps, but I think the most effective tactic is a willingness to do the experimental work yourself.

Sometimes you just have to close your ears. At an opening a few weeks ago, I ran into a photographer who asked if I was working on anything new. I told him about some long exposures of neon lights that I was pretty excited about. In a tone of voice that indicated that he thought it was a dead-end project, he told me he’d once done the same thing. Not wanting to allow myself to get talked out of my enthusiasm, I changed the subject.

The Last Word

← Knowing too much Tossing out the film →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.