• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / PhotoLucida 2009: where’s the power?

PhotoLucida 2009: where’s the power?

May 3, 2009 JimK Leave a Comment

Well, there’s really no question. The reviewers have it; the photographers don’t. The clues are everywhere. The reviewers get a free ride; the photographers pay. The reviewers go into the reviewing room at their leisure; the photographers queue up, flatten themselves against the wall, and wait for the signal from the staff person chosen to be the herder. The photographers are admonished not to pursue the reviewers; I’d be surprised if anyone told the reviewers not to aggressively try to sign up photographers.

It’s all about scarcity. There are a host of talented photographers producing much more quality work than can be accommodated in all the galleries, museums, and publications available. Art photography is like any other glamour profession. In journalism, acting, or playing basketball, the top earners make a fortune, and most of the aspirants need day jobs. So it is with art photography, but in photography, I don’t think it is the prospect of money that fuels the ambitions of most of the hopefuls. For whatever reasons, photographers crave exposure, and the exposure gatekeepers are the top dogs.

I had that point driven home to me in a most uncomfortable way at PhotoLucida. I was standing in the break room looking at another photographer’s work, when a third photographer came in the door, spotted me, and made a beeline in my direction.

“I just talked to Joe Moderotz [made-up name for a reviewer],” he said, “And he said that I should show you my work.”

I’d been reviewed by Joe the day before, so I answered, “Sure, just as soon as I get through looking at these.”

After five or ten minutes, I came around to his side of the table. He told me about the work that he’d brought to the conference, and asked me what I’d like to see. That seemed a little strange; usually photographers show other photographers whatever they want to show them. I picked a couple of series, and started to flip through the pictures, asking a question every so often. Something wasn’t right. This guy was treating me with deference, and enough of it that it finally dawned on me that he must have thought I was a reviewer. Now I didn’t know what to do. Should I say I’m just a photographer, or would that just make a potentially embarrassing situation even worse? I just kept on flipping and commenting for fifteen awkward minutes, thanked the guy, and left.

I’d seen the photographer/reviewer relationship from the other side, and I didn’t like it any better that way.

The Last Word

← PhotoLucida 2009: dealing with criticism PhotoLucida 2009: Feedback →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.