• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Publish your work

Publish your work

July 1, 2008 JimK 1 Comment

Ever thought about doing a book? Sure you have. Maybe you even looked into the economics of it, and realized that, in order to pay for all the setup charges, you needed to have a press run of at least 1000 copies.  Two thousand turns out to be in the sweet spot. You figured out what you’d have to charge to come close to breaking even, and then you figured out how many copies you could sell. With no publishers knocking on your door, and self-promotion the only promotion on offer, you’re going to have a hard time flogging that many books. Maybe you figured you’d give some to galleries and museums as promos. You were generous in estimating how many you could unload on family and friends. When you were done with the mental arithmetic, you had visions of your bank account depleted and your garage piled high with shrink-wrapped copies of your magnum opus.

If thinking about the end game weren’t depressing enough, for some of you the beginning was a high hurdle. You could gather up an impressive set of images. You could write a little text. You could get your spouse to proofread. But InDesign was a mystery to you, and you thought that Quark was the sound made by a duck with a cold.

Most of the things that kept you from holding your very own book in your hand are history. Though conventional offset printing is still the quality leader as well as the least expensive choice when you want a couple of thousand copies, there are some great new choices for short runs. In fact the runs can be as short as one, or at least one at a time. The concept of getting copies of your book printed as you need them is called print on demand. What makes it possible is some new hardware. Hewlett-Packard is selling something that looks and acts like a cross between a printing press and a Xerox machine. In fact the technology inside is pretty much the same as the traditional xerographic process, but using liquid instead of dry toner. Check it out at http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/pscmisc/vac/us/product_pdfs/90566.pdf

Docutech, IBM, Ricoh, and, yes, Xerox all make print engines that are capable of slightly-less-than-offset quality with the option of every printed page being different from every other one.

As you might imagine from looking at the picture in the hp link, these machines are hugely expensive to purchase, and their existence would do us photographers no good if we had buy one to use it. We don’t. Several companies have purchased these machines and are willing to sell you books one at a time for a price that is more than the per-copy cost of a press run of 2000 offset-lithographic books, but a lot less than the per-copy cost of the 500 of that run of 2000 that you’d actually be able to use. The quality is acceptable, but not great. It’s about on a par with your average 150-line-screen CMYK offset press. It’s nowhere near what you can get from state-of-the-art six-color 10-micron diffusion dither offset. If you want a duotone or a tritone, you’ll have to simulate it with cyan, magenta, yellow, and black, and it won’t have the richness or the detail of a real duotone.

But the quality is good enough that criticizing it is akin to complaining about the footwork of a dancing bear. It’s a real book. It feels like one. It looks like one. And the first one cost you less than a hundred bucks — sometimes a lot less. That’s some kind of breakthrough.

So stop pushing aside those dreams of having your own book. Instead, think of what body of work you’d like to publish first. Come up with a title. Find somebody to write the forward.

The Last Word

← Art & Craft More on publishing →

Trackbacks

  1. A book report | The Last Word says:
    May 1, 2015 at 10:06 am

    […] decided to do a book of the Staccato images. Not a short-run Blurb book printed on an hp Indigo, but the real deal printed on an offset press. In the past, I’ve posted my experiences with […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.