• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Shutter shock revisited

Shutter shock revisited

December 29, 2014 JimK Leave a Comment

From the mailbag:

I see you have a Sony a7 II. Does the internal stabilization help with the shutter shake?

The a7II doesn’t suffer from shutter shake, if you use electronic first curtain shutter. If you turn EFCS off, it does, but you only would do that if you were going to use a very high shutter speed.

Does the construction of the lens mount on the 7 and 7R affect shutter shake? The 7S an & 7 II seem to have a more robust mount and there is a way to retrofit that robustness to the 7 & 7R with the Fotodiox mount upgrade.

It’s possible that there is enough flex in the a7 lens mount to affect the shutter shock, but if you care about the effect, you’ll turn EFCS on, and then it’s not a problem. The a7R lens mount is more sturdy than the a7 one. I suppose that replacing the lens mount with an even stiffer one could help on that camera, but I think it’s a long shot.

The Leica M240 has a nice sturdy lens mount (beefed up because Leica expects some of their customers to use R-series lenses on it), and it suffers from shutter shock if you don’t turn off live view before tripping the shutter.

 You seem to have worked out a good way to test the shutter shake. It occurs to me that you could have mounted a big copal shutter via an adapter in front of some lens and then tested the 7R in without its shutter having any effect.

Or I could rig up a Linhof lens board to Sony E mount converter and just use view camera lenses, if I could figure out a way to trip the shutter. But what I do now is simpler. When I want to see what a target looks like without shutter shock, I darken the room, set the exposure time to 2 seconds or longer, connect a Paul Buff Einstein with the flash duration set to 1/13000 second, and use trailing curtain synch.

The Last Word

← Dynamic Range Comparisons with simulated cameras Modeling the Sony alpha 7R →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.