• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Thoughts on long-lens photography

Thoughts on long-lens photography

May 21, 2015 JimK 5 Comments

Before electronic first-curtain shutter (EFCS), long-lens (which I’ll define as 300mm and over on a full-frame 35mm camera) photography was usually about wildlife and sports. For those activities ultimate sharpness wasn’t the prime concern. Those who attempted SLR landscape photos were usually frustrated by camera motion, even with the mirror locked up. With mirrorless cameras without EFCS, problems came in two flavors. Those that allowed live view to be turned off, like the Leica M240, suffered the same kind of camera vibration as those who used SLRs with the mirror up. The mirrorless cameras that didn’t allow live view to be turned off, like the Sony alpha 7R (a7R), had the considerable additional vibration of winding the shutter just before it was fired.

What to do?

You could use medium format cameras with leaf-shutter lenses, but there weren’t many of those over 450mm. I did make a successful series of images using film, a Hasselblad 501CM, and the 500mm f/8 Zeiss Tele-Apotessar CF, but only one. I also did architectural work with a 4×5 film camera and a convertible Nikon lens set to 450mm, but that’s only about 150mm in 35mm terms.

You could try to tame focal plane shutter motion with heavier and heavier tripods, weights, and sandbags. That helped, but the setup usually got to be less than portable before the image was crystal clear.

You could use nosebleed shutter speeds. However, not all landscape photography is done when the sun is high. In fact, you could argue that that’s one of the worst times for landscape photography.

Then along came electronic first-curtain shutter (EFCS). When you use it, the mechanical first curtain is open when the exposure begins, and the exposure is ended by the mechanical second curtain. It doesn’t eliminate all shutter vibration, since, for, say, the 1/320 to 1/125 second at the end of the exposure the camera is disturbed by the acceleration of the second curtain (the second curtain deceleration doesn’t matter, since the shutter is closed by then). However, it eliminates the bulk of the vibration; I’d guess 95% of it at most shutter speeds.

There are other things that can cause camera motion. Wind is the usual culprit. You want to be upwind of your camera when the shutter goes off, but that won’t fix things entirely. In urban environments — and some wild ones — ground motion shakes the camera.

There are other things that can cause blur. Atmospheric disturbances deviled me during some of my lens testing in the last few posts.

But EFCS is a game-changer. You can get sharp results that were just not obtainable before. My first experience with it was on the Sony alpha 7 (a7), and later the alpha 7 mark II (a7II). Those were 24 mega-pixel cameras. Then the Nikon 36MP D810 came out, with one of the big changes from the D800/D800E being the addition of EFCS. I’ve been using it with telephoto lenses recently.

Here are a few things that I’ve discovered.

You have to use live view for accurate focusing. Autofocus just won’t cut it at the sharpest apertures of the two lenses that I’ve been using on the D810, the 400/2.8 and the 200-400/4.

The Nikon AF-S 200-400 mm 1:4G isn’t quite parfocal.  It’s close. Probably close enough for other than landscape application. If you focus at one focal length and zoom in or out the little green dot will stay lit, but he image won’t be critically sharp at f/5.6 and f/8.

Vibration Reduction (VR, in Nikonese) really helps focusing. Without VR, when you magnify live view to the max at long focal lengths and put your hand on the focusing ring to tweak the focus, the image jiggles so much that it’s hard to be accurate. Turning on VR helps immensely.

You need to turn off VR before you make the exposure. You don’t need to do test shots to prove this to yourself. With VR on, set live view to maximum magnification, focus, and take your hand off the camera. You’ll see the image moving.

You can’t turn VR on and off when the camera is rotated counterclockwise into portrait orientation. This may not be true for all lenses, but for the ones I’ve got. When you mount the lens using the rotating collar and rotate the camera counterclockwise into portrait orientation, the VR switch is now down, and you can’t reach it because of the mounting foot. The solution is to rotate the camera clockwise so the switch is up, but that seems weird to me, and makes releasing the shutter awkward.

A 3 second shutter delay is just about perfect with a 400. You can prove this to yourself by setting live view to maximum magnification, taking your hand off the camera, counting “one-Mississippi, two-Mississippi, three-Mississippi” and watch the image settle down. With a longer lens than 400mm, it might not be enough, and that would be too bad, because that’s the longest shutter delay offered on the D810.

 The optical viewfinder is mostly superfluous. For this kind of photography, I almost never use it.

The Last Word

← EFCS in the real world with the Nikon 200-400 f/4 on the D810 Doing it for money →

Comments

  1. Jean Pierre says

    May 23, 2015 at 11:50 pm

    Thanks Jim, you have brought it to the point. What I am missing is the pure electronic shutter, as Fuji has – 1/32000 sec! Will it resolve the vibration of the lens and camerabody? Hm, …
    What it is with the caption of light with so rapid shutter time? Can the electronic of the sensor captering all light informations for fullframe digicam? And are all informations existing? How much will be lost? ….
    I doubt …

    Reply
    • Jim says

      May 24, 2015 at 7:58 am

      Jean Pierre, I don’t think there is any inherent problem with all-electronic shutters, it’s just that, with no gobal shutter storage, as the pixel count goes up, so does the time to make the exposure. The Sony a7S has an all-electronic shutter mode, and it takes 30 milliseconds to make an exposure, although the shutter speed can be much faster. It also loses precision in that mode, down to 12 bits, and picks up read noise, probably from running the ADCs faster.

      Reply
      • Jean Pierre says

        May 25, 2015 at 1:31 am

        Thanks Jim, the a7s has only 12MP Sensor! And with only 12bits it is possible for the electronic to do it! But, with 24MP, 36MP or even 50MP, it is electronical not manageble with one processor!
        For all other Sensor-size (APS-C, MFT, 1″ and smaller) it is possible. So, for FF- or higher sensor-size the mecanical is the solution at the moment! And I do hope, Sony will optimate the EFCS with the new a7rII?!

        Reply
  2. Max Berlin says

    May 27, 2015 at 12:44 pm

    Excellent tip Jim – thank you !

    Vibration Reduction (VR, in Nikonese) really helps focusing. Without VR, when you magnify live view to the max at long focal lengths and put your hand on the focusing ring to tweak the focus, the image jiggles so much that it’s hard to be accurate. Turning on VR helps immensely.

    PS – I did a ‘blue sheet test’ to show Sony compression –

    https://sonyvnikon.wordpress.com/2015/05/27/the-blue-sheet-test-easy-way-to-see-how-sonys-117-compression-negatively-impacts-your-photos/

    Reply
    • Jim says

      May 27, 2015 at 2:30 pm

      Good job, Max. Your test exercises the tone response curve (TRC) part of the algorithm, and produces the expected histogram depopulation in your RD samples. The delta mod piece of the algorithm is not tested by smooth gradients.

      Jim

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.