• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Sony 12-24/4 off axis at 18 & 12 mm

Sony 12-24/4 off axis at 18 & 12 mm

August 25, 2017 JimK Leave a Comment

This is a continuation of this post:

Off-axis aberration testing — Sony 12-24/4 on a7RII

If you got here without reading the previous post, you should go back and do so now.

Here is the full frame at 18 mm:

18 mm

 

Here’s our magnified tight crop of the center, with the same pixel dimensions as before:

Center

 

You can see that in the center the lens is sharper at 18 mm than at 24.

Instead of going clockwise around the periphery, we’ll look at pairs of opposing stars. 

Top-left vs bottom-right:

Upper left

 

Lower Right

 

A hair sharper in the upper left. Nothing to worry about, though.

Top and bottom center:

Upper Middle

 

Lower middle

Maybe the lower side is a tiny bit sharper. That odd SW/NE sharpness anistropy the we saw at 24 mm is not apparent at this focal length.

Top right and bottom left:

Upper Right

 

Lower Left

 

The upper right is a hair sharper. 

Center right and left:

Center Right

 

Center Left

 

A virtual tie.

At 18 mm, this lens appears to be assembled very well.

 

Now the view at 12 mm:

12 mm

The target is getting a bit small, but we’ll see that it’s big enough:

In the center:

Center

You wouldn’t want the target any smaller at this distance. Of course, we’re way beyond the required 7 meters here because I chose to make all the images from the same distance regardless of focal length. This is wonderful resolution for a 12 mm zoom.

Top-left vs bottom-right:

Upper left

 

Lower Right

 

We’re losing a fair amount of resolution in the corners, but this as a UWA zoom, so that’s to be expected. I think this is actually excellent performance, all things considered.

Top and bottom center:

Upper Middle

 

Lower middle

 

Very nice.

Top right and lower left:

Upper Right

 

 

Lower Left

The lower image is softer.

Center right and left:

Center Right

 

Center Left

 

Again, the lens looks good here.

The Last Word

← Off-axis aberration testing — Sony 12-24/4 on a7RII Off-axis lens screening — how big a target? →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.