• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Sony a6300 — digital filtering at high ISOs

Sony a6300 — digital filtering at high ISOs

March 11, 2016 JimK 3 Comments

This is part of a long series of posts about the Sony a6300. The series starts here.

In the post before the last one, I showed a kink in the noise vs ISO setting curve for the a6300 that occurred at high ISO I suspected digital signal processing, specifically, low-pass filtering.

The way to detect this is to look at the frequency response of the read noise. If it’s flat (except for some thermally related stuff near dc) then the camera’s firmware has — quite properly, IMO — kept its mitts off the raw data, at least with respect to filtering.

I looked at the red raw channel for the single shot case. Here’s a baseline, at ISO 100.

100singleshot fft

Nice and flat. Now let’s look at ISO 430, right before the conversion gain switch takes place.

320singleshot fft

Still flat. Now 400:

500singleshot fft

That’s funny. There’s a very slight drop-off with frequency in the horizontal plane. I have no idea waht causes that.

ISO 500:

500singleshot fft

Still a little bit of droop.

6400singleshot fft

ISO 6400 is looking flat.

10000singleshot fft

So is ISO 10000. What about ISO 12800? That’s where we saw the suspicious drop in the noise curves.

12800singleshot fft

There it is. The smoking gun.

Does it persist that way at higher ISOs?

25600singleshot fft

Indeed it does.

The Last Word

← Sony a6300 — high ISO shadow color casts Sony a6300 — taming the EVF/LCD switching →

Comments

  1. Jack Hogan says

    March 12, 2016 at 1:01 am

    Jim, are the frequency plots off a single raw channel or some combination of all four?

    Reply
    • Jim says

      March 12, 2016 at 7:04 am

      The red channel, Jack. I’ll go back and make that clear. Thanks.

      Jim

      Reply
  2. NiceDays says

    April 26, 2025 at 11:56 pm

    Not to be a neatpeak, but you got typo here in text and chart also makes it tough to understand actual data “ISO 430” is “ISO 320” and chart you posted for ISO 400 is same as ISO 500.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.