• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Sony a7II pushed-processed images

Sony a7II pushed-processed images

January 8, 2015 JimK 5 Comments

We have seen from the graphs that the Sony a7II is pretty “ISO-less”. When I get a camera like that, I usually demonstrate the point with some real pictures.

I put the 55mm Zony f/1.8 on the camera, mounted the camera to the RRS generic plate (the L-bracket isn’t yet available), the bracket to a Arca-Swiss head, the head to aRRS tripod, aimed the camera at the bookcase I usually use for this test, set the f-stop to f/5.6, the shutter to 1/13 second, the ISO to 3200, the self-timer to 2 seconds, and, using single shot autofocus, made an exposure which showed a nice ETTRish histogram. Varying nothing but the ISO setting, I made five more exposures at ISO 1600, 800, 400, 200, and 100.

I developed the images in Lightroom 5.7.1 with default settings except for the same custom white balance for all the images. Then I set the Exposure control on the ISO 100 image to an extra +5, the Exposure control on the ISO 200 image to an extra +4, the Exposure control on the ISO 400 image to an extra +3, the Exposure control on the ISO 800 image to an extra +2, the Exposure control on the ISO 1600 image to an extra +1, and didn’t adjust the Exposure of the ISO 3200 image.

The images:

 

ISO 3200
ISO 3200
ISO 1600
ISO 1600
ISO 800
ISO 800
ISO 400
ISO 400
ISO 200
ISO 200
ISO 100
ISO 100

What do the shadows look like? Here they are at 200%:

ISO 3200
ISO 3200
ISO 1600
ISO 1600
ISO 800
ISO 800
ISO 400
ISO 400
ISO 200
ISO 200
ISO 100
ISO 100

And that’s what ISOlessness looks like.

The Last Word

← a7II IBIS with the 180mm Apo-Telyt-R a7II Lr push processing with no NR →

Comments

  1. Bert says

    January 9, 2015 at 2:52 am

    Jim, I did exact the same test some weeks ago and had similar results. No surprises. However I noticed that the color of the image changes gradually with increasing “underexposure”. The image gets warmer / more yellow which cannot be corrected completely with a new white balance setting. Your ISO 100 image also seems more yellow. What is going on here?
    Bert

    Reply
  2. Jim says

    January 9, 2015 at 8:49 am

    Bert,

    I suspect a black point error. I have noticed that the black point changes from its nominal value of 512 slightly with ISO in the a7II (and the a7S, but I haven’t looked at the other alpha 7 cameras). If the raw processor has the wrong black point, then the color balance can be off. The ugly exemplar for this is the Leica M240, which not only changes black point with ISO, but subtracts off the black point before writing the raw files, giving rise to the “green shadows” problem, which requires a special app to fix.

    I consider the Sony color shift minor, however. I’ll bet you wouldn’t have noticed it if I’d have white balanced each image separately.

    Jim

    Reply
  3. zenza says

    February 1, 2015 at 6:24 am

    Can you please compare A7 and A7 II in terms of push processing? DXO showed that A7 II has lower DR like 0.5 stop…. I really would like to see the difference in real world samples…Thanks!!!!

    Reply
    • Jim says

      February 1, 2015 at 6:43 am

      I’m sorry, but my a7 has been modified for infrared.

      Reply
      • zenza says

        February 1, 2015 at 12:18 pm

        That’s bad for us then :/

        Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.