• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Sony a7III EDR in continuous bracketing mode

Sony a7III EDR in continuous bracketing mode

May 20, 2018 JimK 2 Comments

This is a continuation of a series of posts on the Sony a7III.   You should be able to find all the posts about that camera in the Category List on the right sidebar, below the Articles widget. There’s a drop-down menu there that you can use to get to all the posts in this series; just look for “a7III”.

In the previous post, I looked at the engineering dynamic range (EDR) of the Sony a7III in six modes for uncompressed raw files:

  • Single Shot (SS), all-mechanical (MS)
  • SS, electronic first-curtain shutter (EFCS)
  • SS, silent shutter, which I’m calling ES so as not to get it confused with single shot.
  • Continuous Low (CL), MS
  • CL, EFCS
  • CL, ES

In all cases, the base ISO EDR approached 14 bits, which is quite impressive. Switching to compressed raw lowered the EDR only slightly.

But what about continuous mode bracketing, where the camera makes all of the bracketed exposures with one shutter release depression? Continuous bracketing with uncompressed raw files and the electronic shutter doesn’t work. Well, it sort of works. You get exposures, but only one of them, and there’s no actual bracketing.

[A reader has pointed out that this is fixed in firmware 1.10]

With the mechanical shutter, continuous bracketing gives you the following EDR vs ISO curve:

In the above curve, I plotted the EDR for all three exposures. Since I picked 1/3 stop bracketing around 1/1000 second, the exposures were all pretty much alike, so the curve looks like the curve for a single set of exposures. If we zoom in, we can see the discontinuities:

Now let’s put the camera into the compressed mode, and look at both the mechanical shutter case and the electronic shutter one.

We’ve lost more than a stop of EDR!

Zooming in:

Yep. In compressed mode, EDR suffers considerably.

Why is that? Let’s look at some histograms:

Uncompressed at base ISO:

Compressed at base ISO.

The precision has dropped to 12 bits, and the noise is higher.

The Last Word

← a7III EDR vs shutter drive mode a7III, a9 compressed, continuous high EDR →

Comments

  1. Den says

    October 8, 2018 at 6:55 am

    Believe this was fixed in firmware 1.10.

    > Adds support for bracketing during silent shooting with uncompressed RAW.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      October 8, 2018 at 7:17 am

      Thanks! I’ll add a note.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.