• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Sony a7R, a7RII shutter shock with 180/3.4

Sony a7R, a7RII shutter shock with 180/3.4

August 8, 2015 JimK 5 Comments

The mechanical shutter on the Sony a7RII is supposed to be better damped. It also has electronic first-curtain shutter (EFCS). How do those things make moderate telephoto pictures sharper?

The protocol:

  • The cameras: the Sony a7RII and Sony a7R.
  • The lens: the Leica 180mm f/3.4 Apo-Telyt-R
  • The filter: Heliopan 77mm variable neutral density.
  • The lighting: a single Fotodiox LED-200WA-56 daylight balanced flood.
  • ISO set to 800,
  • Manual focusing wide open, then lens set to f/5.6.
  • Drive set to single
  • Camera on an RRS TVC-43 with an Arca Swiss C1 head, RRS L brackets in landscape mode.
  • Exposure protocol: ND filter to minimum attenuation,, shutter to 1/500, make an exposures, ND filter down a third of a stop, shutter down a third of a stop, make another exposures… until you get to 1/10 second.
  • Make a series with both cameras, EFCS on and off in the case of the a7RII.
  • Develop in Lightroom 5.7.1 with standard settings.
  • Crop, export as TIFFs, analyze for horizontal edge (that’s the edge perpendicular to the way the shutter travels) MTF50 in Imatest.
  • Export the results to Excel and graph.

Landscape orientation makes it easier on the mechanical first curtain cases, since the tripod is stiffer in that orientation. Mounting the camera body directly to the tripod also makes it easier on those cases.

The results:

a7riisfr180apo1

The blue line is the a7R. It does the worst even at high shutter speeds by virtue of its slightly lower-resolution sensor. The orange line is the a7RII with both curtains operated by the mechanical shutter. I still exhibits shutter shock, which is not a surprise. The grey curve is the a7RII with EFCS on. It looks pretty darned good.

The Last Word

← a7RII bulb mode spatial filtering at ISO 100, 400, & 1600 a7RII read noise in silent shutter compared to D810 RN →

Comments

  1. Jack Hogan says

    August 9, 2015 at 12:26 am

    Excellent test and results, Jim. My guess is that the (increasing) ondulation of the grey line is due to the lower Exposure resulting in a noisier target. Jack

    Reply
    • Jack Hogan says

      August 9, 2015 at 12:30 am

      On second read it appears that you keep exposure constant, so ignore previous reply. Jack

      Reply
      • Jim says

        August 9, 2015 at 7:43 am

        That’s right. Thanks for commenting though, Jack. Always nice to hear from you.

        Jim

        Reply
  2. Matti Meikalainen says

    August 9, 2015 at 2:15 am

    Hi, not about this, but just a hope that once you start testing the range finder lens compability, I’d wish you’d also compare curvature of field on both A7rII and A7(r) with some lenses with exist pupil close to the sensor.

    Reply
    • Jim says

      August 9, 2015 at 7:41 am

      Coming up. I don’t expect corner smearing to change, since that’s a function of the sensor stack thickness, but I have hopes for lower corner color casting and “Italian flag” effects.

      Jim

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.