• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Sony a7RII bulb exposure with LENR

Sony a7RII bulb exposure with LENR

August 22, 2015 JimK Leave a Comment

There has been a little speculation that the increase in noise observed in the ISO 100 long exposure noise reduction (LENR) images in yesterday’s post might be wholly or in part the result of the a7RII’s dropping into 12-bit precision when LENR is active.

Fortunately, there’s a way to test that. Yesterday’s exposures were 30 seconds long, made in single shot mode with the camera timing the exposure. That results in 13-bit non-LENR and 12-bit LENR images. In bulb mode, the camera also drops into 12-bit mode (and performs some spatial filtering to boot.

So, if we compare two 30 second dark-field bulb exposures, one with LENR and one without, we’ll have two 12-bit images to compare, and we can see if the LENR still hurts the standard deviation.

A 400×400 central ample without LENR:

_DSC2077-Sel-3800-2450-400x400 lin

And with LENR:

_DSC2039-Sel-3800-2450-400x400 bulb lin

You can see the LENR exposure his higher “sidebands”, indicating more noise, although in both cases, the noise is close to the least significant bit of the 12-bit representation, indicating possilble insufficient dither.

Looking at log representations shows LENR at work. First, the non-LENR image:

_DSC2077-Sel-3800-2450-400x400 log

There is indication of a few hot pixels in the tail to the right.

Now with LENR:

_DSC2039-Sel-3800-2450-400x400 bulb log

The tails are gone, but at the expense of increased spread to the histogram.

Now let’s look at a few histograms of the entire image. The danger of doing this is that we could be looking at pattern read noise, but you could argue that LENR is supposed to reduce that, too. The advantage is that, instead of a measly 160,000 pixels in the sample, there will be more than 42 million.

Linear histogram, no LENR:

_DSC2077-Full-8000x5320 bulb

And with LENR:

_DSC2039-Full-8000x5320 bulb lin

The same spreading occurs as in the smaller sample.

Now with log scaling of the vertical axis. First with no LENR:

_DSC2077-Full-8000x5320 bulb log

With the larger population, the hot pixel tail is more apparent.

And with LENR turned on.

_DSC2039-Sel-3800-2450-400x400 bulb log

The tail is gone, but at the expense of a larger standard deviation.

Let’s put this noise in perspective. It’s so small encoded with 12-bit precision that LENR is unnecessary, even if it had no negative side effects. On the other hand, the damage done by LENR on these images in minimal, and probably inconsequential, once you’ve accepted the drop back to 12-bit precision that comes with bulb mode.

But with long exposures, LENR is a pain to deal with in the field. Best to leave if off at low ISOs. Even at high ISOs you should think twice about using it, especially since Sony starts using it a shutter speeds that are too short.

The Last Word

← Sony a7RII LENR at ISO 100 a7RII operation with highly active subjects →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.