• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Sony a7RII lowpass filtering in various shutter modes

Sony a7RII lowpass filtering in various shutter modes

August 10, 2015 JimK 1 Comment

I received a request to look at what, if any, lowpass filtering the a7RII performs on dark-field images at ISO 100. Dark field images are mostly Gaussian noise at higher ISOs, although they can contain low-frequency energy do to pattern variations.  A standard technique to remove the pattern variations is to subtract two dark frames and analyze the result. I have used that technique before, and will again, but I have found that it confuses people, and I didn’t do it here.

The first test case is a 6 second exposure using silent shutter, single shot mode, long exposure noise reduction (LENR, aka dark frame subtraction) turned off. The camera timed the exposure:

fft silent

There is no evidence of any low pass filtering. There is evidence of horizontal pattern noise in the form of a high component at extreme low frequency.

Next up, a 6 second bulb exposure in single shot mode with LENR off:

fft bulb

We have evidence of lowpass filtering in both the vertical and horizontal directions. In addition, there is a periodic effect in the horizontal direction. I don’t know what causes that, although I’ve seen it before in some a7S dark field images.

Now, the same bulb exposure with LENR on:

fft lenr

Not much different, except that the periodic component in the horizontal direction is reduced. I take that to mean that the periodic component has a pattern component (not variable frame to frame), and a variable component, but I suppose it’s possible the processing is different.

And lastly, a 6 second camera-timed exposure in continuous shutter mode:

fft cont

There is no evidence of lowpass filtering in the vertical direction. The periodic component falls in modulation index as the frequency goes up, however.

I seriously doubt whether there is intentional anisotropous filtering being done by the Sony engineers. Therefore I think we can look to the vertical frequency lines to see what the camera’s design engineers deliberately put there. That would say that the silent shutter image and the continuous shutter images have no lowpass filtering added, while both of the bulb images do.

The Last Word

← Sony a7RII EFCS & silent shutter sharpness How fast is the Sony a7RII silent shutter? →

Comments

  1. Dean says

    October 9, 2015 at 7:40 am

    Interesting case study here. Thanks for taking the time to put it together.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.