• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Sony a7S dark-field images — ISO 3200

Sony a7S dark-field images — ISO 3200

October 29, 2014 JimK 3 Comments

The Sony a7S switches to high-conversion-gain mode as the ISO dial is moved from 1600 to 2000. Thus ISO 3200 is the first whole f-stop ISO to get the benefit of increased conversion gain. In this post, I’ll show ISO 3200 dark-field images filtered with the same set of kernels as the ISO 100 images in the preceding post.

First, the unfiltered image:

a7SISO3200-1

Now, with 11-pixel kernels:

11 pixel horizontal averaging kernel
11 pixel horizontal averaging kernel
11 pixel vertical averaging kernel
11 pixel vertical averaging kernel

 

11 pixel square averaging kernel
11 pixel square averaging kernel

Now with 107 pixel kernels:

 

107 pixel horizontal averaging kernel
107 pixel horizontal averaging kernel

107 pixel vertical averaging kernel

107 pixel vertical averaging kernel

 

107 pixel square averaging kernel
107 pixel square averaging kernel

And finally with 871 pixel kernels:

871 pixel horizontal averaging kernel
871 pixel horizontal averaging kernel
871 pixel vertical averaging kernel
871 pixel vertical averaging kernel
871 pixel square averaging kernel
871 pixel square averaging kernel

The plots indicated that the ISO 3200 read noise was higher frequency, and therefore less objectionable, than the ISO 100 noise. The way that these images are scaled prohibits absolute comparisons — for that you’ll have to look at the plots — but seems to bear out the conclusions from the plots.

Objectionable qualities being in the mind of the beholder, you’ll have to judge for yourself.

 

 

 

 

The Last Word

← Sony a7S dark-field images — ISO 100 Hasselblad H2D-39 read noise analysis →

Comments

  1. Jack says

    October 29, 2014 at 11:52 am

    Hi,

    I own the a7s, but i don’t have enough knowledge about digital sensors to get a conclusion of you results. Could you explain the implications of your test in real life usage?
    Thanks

    Reply
    • Jim says

      October 29, 2014 at 12:53 pm

      I’m not done with my explorations of read noise and its effect on image quality yet, but here’s what I’d say about the a7S. If you can’t get as much light as you want on the sensor at base ISO, keep turning it up. When you get to ISO 3200, stop; there will only be small read noise improvements after that. All that assumes that you’re shooting raw.

      I’ve skipped over a lot of stuff, but that’s the 50,000 foot view.

      Jim

      Reply
  2. Jack says

    October 31, 2014 at 2:46 pm

    Thanks for the explanation!

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.