• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / a9 / Sony a9 precision

Sony a9 precision

May 26, 2017 JimK 6 Comments

This is the second in a series of posts on the Sony a9. The series starts here.

On the a7x cameras, the quantizing precision of raw files is 13 bits in compressed raw mode with the mechanical or EFC shutter and the drive mode set to single shot. If you use the electronic shutter (called silent shutter in the a7x cameras and electronic shutter in the a9), the precision drops to 12 bits in both uncompressed and compressed operation. If you use continuous shutter mode,  the precision also drops to 12 bits in both uncompressed and compressed operation.

What about the a9? Turns out that the camera always drops to 12 bit precision in continuous shutter mode, like its cousins, but stays in 14/13 bit mode with the drive set to single shot. 

I made a series of dark field images with the raw format set to uncompressed, and the mechanical shutter set to electronic first curtain shutter (EFCS). When I used the continuous drive mode, I set the rate to low. I turned off all the lens corrections. And, although it shouldn’t matter when making exposures of he back of the body cap, I turned off IBIS, too. I looked at 400×400 crops in the center of the image. This is a worst-case place to look for sensors that are step-exposed in processing, like the a9 must be. It also may be a tough place to look for stacked sensors like the one in the a9.

Here are some histograms. We’ll start with ISO 250, which is high enough to get enough noise to see the shape of the distribution:

EFCS SS ISO 250

You can see that all 14 bits are present.

ES SS ISO 250

With the electronic shutter on, things look pretty much the same. Note that there is no material increase in noise level, which was not the casse in the a7x cameras.

In continuous mode:

EFCS cont ISO 250

The two LSBs are AWOL.

ES Continuous ISO 250

Same with the electronic shutter. I’m pretty sure Sony does this to get the frame rate up.

If we move the ISO knob to 640, this is what we see:

EFCS SS ISO 640

14 bits. But look! The noise at 640 is less than the noise at ISO 250. That’s because the a9 uses the Aptina DR-Pix trick of increasing the conversion gain when you go from ISO 500 to 640. Those are the same ISOs as the a7RII.

ES SS ISO 640

The histogram is not quite as symmetrical as with EFCS on, but there’s really not much change. Does the blue histogram look a bit strange to you? It does to me, too. Hold that thought until we get to ISO 6400.

In continuous drive mode:

EFCS cont ISO 640

 

Bits 13 and 14 are gone.

ES cont ISO 640

OK, now we’ll move up to ISO 6400:

EFCS SS ISO 6400

That is the nicest histogram I’ve seen from a Sony alpha camera. The only thing that keeps it from being perfect is the slight combing in the blue channel. That’s not going to affect your photographs in an of itself, but it does indicate that there may be some raw processing going on.

ES SS ISO 6400

Looks the same with the electronic shutter.

EFCS cont ISO 6400

 

Turning the continuous shutter drive on costs us two bits.

ES cont ISO 6400

Turning the electronic shutter on costs us nothing. This is good news.

Next, we’ll take a closer look at the read noise as a function of ISO setting.

a9, The Last Word

← Sony a9 testing Sony a9 EDR vs ISO setting →

Comments

  1. Jack Hogan says

    May 26, 2017 at 10:45 pm

    The asymmetrical read noise at ISO640 could point to some potential FPN?
    The combing in the blue channel at ISO6400 could mean integer division?

    Reply
  2. Eric Calabros says

    May 26, 2017 at 11:22 pm

    So why they didn’t remove the mechanical shutter? They say in most cases we don’t need it. Why not “all” cases?

    Reply
    • DV says

      May 27, 2017 at 9:41 am

      Flash sync still requires it in this case. Also, there is still a potential for banding/rolling shutter in certain situations (though far, far reduced compared to a7 series silent shutter).

      If they can figure out a way to crack flash sync with the high-speed readout (versus a global shutter), the mech shutter will be gone in a generation.

      Reply
  3. Michael Brown says

    June 22, 2017 at 9:25 am

    Nitpicks: diurve should be drive in the first para. Ore -> or near the end.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      June 22, 2017 at 10:12 am

      Fixed. I Always appreciate typo corrections.

      Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Sony a9: Technical Testing Roundup | Sony Addict says:
    May 30, 2017 at 5:00 pm

    […] The Last Word – Sony a9 precision “Turning the continuous shutter drive on costs us two bits.” down from 14-bit, “Turning the electronic shutter on costs us nothing. This is good news.” […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.