• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Sony RX-1 review, part 9

Sony RX-1 review, part 9

January 31, 2013 JimK 2 Comments

This is a continuation of the Sony RX-1 review that started here.

The Sony TGA-1 thumb grip arrived yesterday. I’d used a similar device on Leicas, so it was familiar to me. It slips into the accessory shoe. When I first installed it, I was worried, since it was even looser than the Leica optical finder that I had previously used there. I flipped the thump-rest to the left – it’s hinged – and saw a small locking device. It locked down solidly.

I installed the Leica optical finder in the accessory clip on top of the thumb grip. If fit fine. I’m glad I don’t need gaffer tape to hold the finder on, but I’m a little worried that the accessory shoe on the top of the camera is out of spec. I’ll find out when the electronic viewfinder arrives.

The thumb grip provides a nice shooting position when used with an accessory optical finder. It’s a bit close to the finder if you shoot left-eyed, and perfect if you use your right eye. When holding the camera at arm’s length, I find that it offers no particular advantage. It makes it easier to pick up the camera with your right hand.

The thumb grip also facilitates doing sweep panos with the camera oriented vertically with your arm straight and pointed downwards. The sweeping is done with a twist of the wrist. I perfected this technique with the Nikon D4, but the D4 is so noisy, especially when set to maximum frame rate, that it attracts a lot of attention. The RX-1 is much, much quieter, and should be pretty stealthy in this application. I don’t use the in-camera sweep pano software, preferring to stich it later using Autopano Giga, and avoiding jpeg compression and reduced resolution.

I talked earlier about the RX-1 being a natural camera for street photography. I now realize that you can’t use it like I usually did doing street photography with a Nikon RF camera, a Plaubel Makina, Leicas, and even with a Hasselblad 500C/M. With those cameras, I would usually zone focus, bring the camera to my eye, trip the shutter, and lower it immediately. Zone focusing is not practical on the RX-1; there are no distance markings (though there are crude ones on the LCD screen) or depth of field indications. I think the thing to try is presetting the autofocus rectangle to the center, which is the only place you have a prayer of finding with the optical finder, and let the camera focus, maybe using focus lock if the subject isn’t in the center of the frame. Doesn’t sound optimum. We’ll see.

The Last Word

← Sony RX-1 review, part 8 Sony RX-1 review, part 10 →

Comments

  1. Tommy says

    February 2, 2013 at 5:00 pm

    I would also add the thumb grip does not work with the EVF as it does not pass through the electrical connection. Another street photography downside is that since the RX1 uses a fly-by-wire manual focus, it you try to zone focus, walk around, have the camera time out, and then turn on again, the focus distance is reset by the camera. This is probably the biggest issue hoping the RX1 would be a great street camera.

    Reply
  2. Jim says

    February 2, 2013 at 5:16 pm

    All true, sad to say. See part 11 for a couple of (imperfect) work-arounds.

    Jim

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.