• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Testing for decentering visually with AF

Testing for decentering visually with AF

March 26, 2016 JimK 1 Comment

Yesterday I posted this piece on testing for lens decentering using manual focusing. Today I’ll explore an autofocus variant that might be useful when there’s not enough depth of field for the first technique to work well.

I mounted a Sony 90mm f/2.8 macro lens on an a7RII and set it up about 20 feet from an ISO 12233 target. I lit it with two Westcott LED panels set to 5000K. I set the ISO to 100, the f-stop to f/2.8, the exposure to manual, and centered the target. I set the focus mode to AF-S, flexible spot, with the medium spot size. I cantered the target in the frame, centered the spot in the finder, set the shutter speed to 1/640 second, and fired off a shot using the 5 second self timer.

_DSC6295

By the way, note my spiffy new Velcro target mounting system. I developed the images in Lr CC 2015.5.

Here’s a tight crop (about 250%)  of the upper right rosette:

_DSC6295-2

Pretty sharp.

I set the focus point in turn to each of the four corners, and put the target in the appropriate corner, and made a set of four exposures. Here are the tight crops. You can see which is which by remembering that the coarse sides of the rosette are on the outsides of the images.

_DSC6297

 

_DSC6296

_DSC6298

_DSC6299

The right hand side is a hair softer than the left, but the difference is tiny. I call this lens sufficiently centered.

I reasoned that a zoom might have a larger chance of being decentered, so I swapped the Sony 90 macro for the 70-200 f/4 Sony zoom. I set the focal length to 90mm as best I could (it’s not marked) and made another similar series of exposures, this time with the shutter set to 1/320, since the zoom is a stop slower than the macro.

The overall scene:

_DSC6300

The cropped center:

_DSC6300-2

The zoom isn’t as sharp as the macro. No surprise there.

The four corners:

_DSC6302

_DSC6303

_DSC6304

_DSC6301

I call that lens centered, too.

The Last Word

← Serial monogamy in camera ownership Testing for decentering by the numbers with AF →

Trackbacks

  1. Testing for decentering by the numbers with AF | The Last Word says:
    March 27, 2016 at 7:31 am

    […] Yesterday I posted the results of testing two lenses, the Sony 90 mm f/2.8 OSS G FE, and the Sony 70-200 f/4 OSS G FE, on the Sony a7RII. The tests were aimed at detecting and quantifying decentering, using visual appraisal, and showed both lenses to have minimal decentering. […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.