• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Testing for ETTR, part 11

Testing for ETTR, part 11

December 10, 2012 JimK Leave a Comment

I have a D3x modified by LifePixel with the so-called “Deep IR” filter. I attempted to get the in-camera histogram to look like the real raw histogram. I achieved only partial success.

With the camera now so IR-sensitive in all three channels (the red, green, and blue filters that form the Bayer pattern on the sensor all pass a fair amount of IR) and so insensitive to visible light in all three channels, trying to photograph colored squares on the monitor and using them as white balance targets seemed like a waste of time.

I tried making an exposure so long that I saturated all the photosites and using that as the white balance target. The camera seemed to accept it, but the coefficients in the EXIF metadata didn’t change at all.

That left manually adjusting the white balance color temperature, M/G, and A/B offsets. There wasn’t enough range to get all the coefficients to one. I found the 3700 degrees Kelvin with 6 units of green bias got the red coefficient close, but the blue one was quite a ways off:

Reasoning that, with IR, the red channel is usually the one that is the most sensitive, I stopped there. In test photographs like this one:

The blue channel looks clipped when it’s not:

But if I use the red channel as the basis for ETTR, I seem to get good results:

There may be subjects and lighting where this scheme doesn’t work. Time will tell. It’s not a very satisfying conclusion, but I hope it’s an adequate one. If I had been thinking ahead, and if I knew then what I know now, I would have tried to find a white balance correction before I had the camera converted. Another solution would be to download a D3x UniWB NEF file, but I can’t find one, although I can find now-broken links that apparently used to point to such files.

The Last Word

← Raw histogram approximation — why bother? What’s luminance? →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.