the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / Raw histogram approximation — why bother?

Raw histogram approximation — why bother?

December 10, 2012 JimK Leave a Comment

A few people have questioned why I’m going to all this trouble to find out how to approximate the real raw histogram. Why not just accept the extra safety margin that the camera gives with a normal JPEG preview image?

I dealt with some of that here. Here’s a salient excerpt:

…if a full frame camera, measured under a standard set of conditions with its output file res’ed to a certain resolution has an SNR [signal-to-noise ratio] of x, an APS-C camera will have an SNR of 0.7x. A micro four-thirds camera will have an SNR of half of x. A Leica D-Lux 4 will have an SNR of one quarter x. An iPhone will have an SNR of one-eighth of x. Going the other way, a medium format camera will have an SNR of somewhat less than 2x, and a 4×5 scanning back will have an SNR of a little less than 4x.

Can we quantify the SNR effects of ETTR? Indeed we can. Let’s take an image that’s exposed perfectly to the right. No clipping or blown highlights, but information in the very top histogram bucket. Let’s pick a pixel group in that image, and measure its SNR. Let’s say it measures y. If we underexpose one stop from the perfect ETTR image, that pixel group will have an SNR of half of y.  If we’re two stops under, the SNR is a quarter of y. Three stops under, and it’s an eighth.

So, from a noise point of view, you can turn your full frame SLR into an iPhone by underexposing by three stops.

Think of it another way. Why pay for and lug around a camera with a big sensor if you’re not going to get the results that it can deliver?

The Last Word

← Reproducible results Testing for ETTR, part 11 →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

October 2023
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  
« Sep    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Alan on Fujifilm GFX 100 II — preparing for photon transfer curve testing
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100 II ISO setting vs gain
  • NA on Fujifilm GFX 100 II ISO setting vs gain
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100 II ISO setting vs gain
  • Nikojorj on Fujifilm GFX 100 II ISO setting vs gain
  • Brandon on GFX 100 II read noise in CH drive mode
  • JimK on GFX 100 II EDR summary
  • Denz on GFX 100 II EDR summary
  • Erik Kaffehr on GFX 100 II read noise in CH drive mode
  • UA on More on GFX 100 II electronic shutter speeds

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.