• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Sony a7 noise floor

Sony a7 noise floor

February 18, 2014 JimK Leave a Comment

Here’s the average value of the standard deviation of noise floor in the central 90% of the image vs ISO at 1/30th second:

a7 nf std iso 100 25000

If the amplifiers and the analog to digital converters in the a7 were perfect, and all the read noise came from the sensor array itself, then the read noise would double every time you doubles the ISO setting in the camera.  Subtracting out that doubling, we get a corrected graph that looks like this:

a7 nf cor iso 100 25000

You can see that there is a modest reduction in the noise floor up to about ISO 1600. Above that, turning up the ISO control does not reduce the effective noise floor, although it certainly reduces the dynamic range. There is one bit of strangeness: the sudden drop at ISO 25600. In order to figure what that’s all about, I looked at some histograms.

At ISO 100, we have the every-other-bucket histogram that we’re becoming familiar with:

iso 100 histo

At ISO 200, same-old-same-old, just with more noise:

iso 200 histo

Yet more noise at ISO 400:

iso 400 histo

And more yet at ISO 800:

iso 800 histo

And still more at ISO 1600. Bored? Hang in there.

iso 1600 histo

At ISO 3200, we get combing — some of the buckets getting more than their one-door-down neighbors (the next-door neighbors’ bucket remain empty):

iso 3200 histo

At ISO 6400, there is more combing. This is strange. It’s not just straight digital gain, which would result in every fourth or every eighth bucket being occupied. Also, the behavior of the two green channels starts to diverge, although, because of the log vertical scale that’s not as significant as it looks:

 

 

iso 6400 histo

At ISO 12800, we have waves:

iso 12800 histo

And at ISO 25600, we have enough to go surfing:

iso 25600 histo

I suspect, but am not sure, that the odd behavior may be the result of the Sony raw compression algorithm. If we zoom out on the histogram, we can see that the noise is great enough to move into the compressed region of the tone curve:

iso 25600 histo wide

I’m thinking that tone compression is probably the cause of the sudden drop in noise at ISO 25600. Also, if you look at the number of values in the lower right of the Rawdigger statistics, you can see that by ISO 3200 it exceeds 128, which is the number of different values that the delta modulation part of the Sony raw compression can handle. That’s not a problem unless that range is exceeded in one 16-pixel compression block.

The Last Word

← Testing the Sony a7, part 1 Sony a7 noise floor in continuous mode →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • John Griffin on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.