the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / Sony a7 noise floor in continuous mode

Sony a7 noise floor in continuous mode

February 19, 2014 JimK 4 Comments

All of the histograms in the preceding post were made with the drive mode in single shot. When you put it in continuous, you get something different:

ISO 100:

iso 100 histo cont shutter

ISO 200:

iso 200 histo cont shutter

ISO 400:

iso 400 histo cont shutter

In each case, only every fourth bucket has data. The pattern is the same at other shutter speeds and ISOs. In single shot mode the a7 is a 13-bit camera. In continuous mode, it’s a 12-bit device. This characterization is only accurate at 13-bit raw values of 1000 or less; above that, the Sony raw tone curve reduces the resolution until near saturation, where it’s 11 bits.

A reader has asked if that’s true with auto-bracketing as well. I’m afraid it is. With auto bracketing set in continuous mode, you get 12 bits. With auto bracketing set in single shot mode, you get 13 bits.

Unless there’s interest, I don’t plan to do any more testing of the camera in continuous mode, since that’s not how I intend to use it. I’m sure the Sony engineers have some reason to do raw processing differently in the two drive modes, but it sure adds confusion to a user trying to figure out how to use the camera and aggravation to a reviewer not looking for extra work.

The Last Word

← Sony a7 noise floor Is the Sony a7 ISOless? →

Comments

  1. n/a says

    February 19, 2014 at 11:00 am

    > In continuous mode, it’s a 12-bit device.

    does that include exposure bracketing too (3 or 5 shots) ?

    Reply
    • Jim says

      February 19, 2014 at 11:01 am

      I don’t know. I’ll have to test.

      Reply
      • n/a says

        February 19, 2014 at 11:05 am

        that might be interesting because I guess bracketing is much more used w/ cameras like A7/A7r vs just spray and pray continous shooting…

        Reply
  2. Erik Kaffehr says

    February 19, 2014 at 11:43 am

    It seems that the A99 also worked that way. 14 bit mode in single shot but 12 bit mode in continuos modes. I always presumed it depended on ADC timing.

    Best regards
    Erik

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

March 2023
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Jan    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S pixel shift, visuals
  • Sarmed Mirza on Fujifilm GFX 100S pixel shift, visuals
  • lancej on Two ways to improve the Q2 handling
  • JimK on Sony 135 STF on GFX-50R, sharpness
  • K on Sony 135 STF on GFX-50R, sharpness
  • Mal Paso on Christmas tree light bokeh with the XCD 38V on the X2D
  • Sebastian on More on tilted adapters
  • JimK on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • Kyle Krug on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • JimK on Hasselblad X2D electronic shutter scan time

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.