• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Traveling with Sony alpha 7’s

Traveling with Sony alpha 7’s

August 22, 2014 JimK 3 Comments

I returned on Sunday from a 9-day trip to the Canadian Rockies, staying outside of the town of Banff. It wasn’t specifically a photographic trip. It was mainly a family holiday. But, of course, I planned to make photographs. What kind of photographs? I thought a little landscape work even though the times of best light are usually when the family is asleep or eating. Most of the pictures would be people, though.

What gear to take?

I considered the delightful Nikon D810; which, by virtue of its improved autofocus, is a more versatile instrument than its predecessor. However, by the time I added a backup body and a few lenses, it turned out to be more weight than I wanted to carry, either in my travel bag or while hiking. Nikon lenses, at least the ones I have, are pretty heavy.

I considered taking an M240, the Sony alpha 7S as backup, and a few M lenses that could be used on either body, plus the Zony 55mm f/1.8 for when I wanted autofocus. That would have reduced the travel weight considerably. The Leica lenses tend to be small and light, even though they are dense. However, the M240 body is fairly weighty.

I finally settled on the Sony a7 and the a7S, the Zony 55mm, the Sony 70-200 f/4 OSS FE zoom, and the Leica 24mm f/3.8 Elmar. The Zony 55 is wonderfully sharp, light, and has AF. The zoom has unexceptional, but adequate, clarity, and is light compared to a 70-200 f/2.8, although no lighter than the Nikon equivalent. The Elmar is a crisp lens with great drawing, and it works well on the a7S (but not on the a7).

I figured I could make panos with the 55 if I wanted a lot of pixels, and it would be a good indoor lens. The Leica 24 would work well on the trail, and I could use zone focusing if things moved fast. The zoom would mostly be useful outside for people pictures, and could be pressed into service if I found cooperative animals.

I put a 64GB card in the a7S and a 128GB one in the a7, giving me a little over 5000 shots per camera. I brought along spare cards in a Pelican carrier, but did not intend to use them. I took 2 extra batteries and the Sony charger.

I took an Adorama Slinger bag and a LL Bean fanny pack. I could fit everything in the Slinger and everything but the zoom in the fanny pack. I use Domke wraps to keep things from banging together, and chalk bags for smaller lenses.

What did I learn?

In fluid situations, the alpha 7’s make you go to the menu system more than I’d like. This is especially difficult in bright light, and if you’re wearing a hat. What’s the deal with the hat? Bright light makes both the LCD screen and the EVF hard to see. When you’re wearing a hat and you lean closely over the LCD screen so that it’s shaded, the camera thinks that you’ve put it up to your eye and turns the LCD off. My standard for camera user interfaces is the Nikon D4, and I understand that the pro-level Canons are much the same. On the D4 – and the D8x0, for that matter – there are a series of dedicated buttons for the most commonly used functions, and a passive monochromatic LCD panel on top of the camera which if anything is more visible in bright light. Press the button, twiddle one or both of the control wheels, and you’re done. The Sony a7 series makes moves in the direction of direct access to some functions, with a dedicated exposure compensation control, the two top-level wheels (I’ve turned the rotating dial on the back of the camera off because it’s too easy to spin by accident), and the user-assignable buttons, but without the feedback provided by the Nikon’s top-of-camera LCD screen, when the light gets bright, you’re in the dark about what the camera is doing.

The alpha 7 series cameras are highly customizable. That’s a good thing. If you’re using two or more of them in one photo session, you’d be well advised to configure all the cameras as close to the same way as is possible. Mine were set up similarly, but not identically, and several times I said that, when I got back to the hotel, I’d take half an hour or so and set them up the same. I never did, though. Best to do it before the trip.

Although the autofocus of the a7 is not bad by mirrorless standards, and the a7S AF is pretty good when it’s really dark, neither camera can AF remotely as well as a D810. It doesn’t make much difference when the subject is stationary, but when things are moving around on you, your frame rate will drop and you’ll have more than a few misfocused images.

The low weight is a real boon on the trail. Having both cameras, the 55, and the 24 in a fanny pack makes for a light load.

There have been complaints about alpha 7 battery life. You will hear none from me. You can make almost a thousand images on one of the little batteries if you don’t chimp much. I carried two extras in my pack and never needed them.

In a week or so, I’ll have edited the images and will report more.

The Last Word

← Nikon D810 high-ISO noise reduction Mitigating subject motion in slit scan images →

Comments

  1. Phillip Dobson says

    August 25, 2014 at 6:42 pm

    Chalk bags for your lenses? Are you referring to the ones we use climbing?

    I think all of mine are full of chalk right now.

    Reply
    • Jim says

      August 25, 2014 at 7:42 pm

      Yep.

      if they’ve been full of chalk, they’re out of the running for lens bags. Otherwise, they’re great. I especially like the way the mouth stays open.

      Jim

      Reply
  2. Phillip Dobson says

    August 25, 2014 at 8:55 pm

    I found a clean one in the basement! (I’m a hoarder of climbing gear.) It fits the Zeiss 12mm nicely. The other smaller lenses live in beer coozies.

    I also use an Outdoor Research Nalgene parka for the 70-200 F4 and it’s great.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.