• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Viltrox 35 mm f/2 FE stopped down

Viltrox 35 mm f/2 FE stopped down

January 2, 2017 JimK 1 Comment

This is a continuation of an informal test of the $167 Viltrox 35 mm f/2 lens on a Sony a7RII camera. For comparison, I’ll be showing some images from the Sony RX1 with its native — and exemplary — 35 mm f/2 lens. The test starts here.

This is the overall test scene:

In the center, with the Viltrox, at f/2.8, at about 200%:

Viltrox f/2.8

Pretty darned sharp, and the LoCA is less apparent than at f/2.

Now with the RX1, enlarged a bit more to account for the difference in pixel pitch between the two cameras. The angle of view is maintained. This, and the AA filter on the RX1, puts that lens at a disadvantage.

RX1 at f/2.8

My guess is that the slight fuzziness on the RX1 image as compared to the a7RII image is due to the AA filter and the coarser pixel pitch, not the lens itself.

Now the upper right corner with both lenses.

Viltrox upper right corner at f/2.8

 

RX1 upper right corner at f/2.8

The additional depth of field (DOF) provided at f/2.8 over the f/2 of the previous test is not enough to overcome the strong filed curvature of the Viltrox lens. There is less corner falloff than there was at f/2, but still substantially more than the RX1 lens.

If we focus the Viltrox on the upper right corner, the distance scale says 10 feet! In that case, the corner looks like this:

Viltrox UR Foc UR at f/2.8

It is nowhere near the Sony RX1 lens sharpness, but it’s not as awful as the image focused at the center,m either.

I’ll spare you the lower left corner images, since they are essentially the same as the upper right corner ones. By the way, that sameness indicates that both lenses are probably properly assembled.

At f/4, in the center:

Viltrox Center at f/4

 

RX1 Center at f/4

Both lenses’ sharpness at f/4 is about the same as that at f/2.8. As we stop down we weill just see the effects of diffraction in the center of the field. 

In the upper right corner at f/4:

Viltrox upper right at f/4

 

RX1 upper right at f/4

Even f/4 is not enough to overcome the field curvature of the Viltrox.

If we focus on the upper right:

Viltrox upper right, focus upper right at f/4

Better, but still not a match for the RX1.

I won’t show you any more center-field images as the lenses are stopped down, since all you’d see is diffraction setting in on both lenses. I will show you the upper right corner with the Viltrox, but with the lens focused in the center, and in the upper right corner.

Viltrox UR focus center, f/5.6

 

Viltrox UR Focus UR f/5.6

 

Viltrox upper right focus center at f/8

 

Viltrox upper right, focus upper right, f/8

Wow! That’s really strong field curvature. I don’t think I’ve seen anything like this before.

Viltrox upper right, focus center, f/11

 

Viltrox upper right, focus upper right, f/11

The Viltrox sure isn’t going to be a decent landscape lens.

The Last Word

← A dirt-cheap FE lens Viltrox 35 mm f/2 FE meets the bunny →

Comments

  1. Aaron Reichow says

    March 5, 2017 at 6:36 pm

    Shame about the extreme field curvature – otherwise this could have even a nice lens to have! I don’t mind a bit of FC, as long as I can take a landscape at f/8 with good edges and OK corners. This is out of control, like using my Contax G 28mm f/2.8 Biogon on my A7.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.