• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Violins and cameras revisited

Violins and cameras revisited

February 27, 2019 JimK Leave a Comment

I mentioned the violin proverb

If you buy a violin, you own a violin; if you buy a camera, you are a photographer.

to a violinist on the DPR MF forum, and attributed it to a friend who is both a musician and a photographer.

I thought that what the violinist wrote back was dead on, and beautifully put to boot. So I asked and received permission to quote it here:

I think the difference is that, upon picking up a violin, no one thinks they can play it, and the rest of the world is in unanimous agreement. The same cannot be said for people picking up today’s cameras.

I think it is no easier to make art on one than the other though. I live for a few musical moments out of the year, when something comes together in a way that gets to me in a way that nothing else does. Half a dozen meaningful photographs in a year is doing well, but it takes more than that to make a living, so we are not really talking about Art. We are talking about getting up and going to work. Much of what I do as an orchestral musician is making things fit together in an imperfect performance that is going, in some or many ways, not the way I might wish it was going. It’s like installing new plumbing in an old house. Do your job, make it work, do it competently, be professional. But when it is right, well, that’s why I do it.

Referring to another recent discussion on this forum, I have a photographer friend who for 3 years did nothing but product shots of white pvc pipe fittings on medium format transparency film. Just one catalog after another. We are talking about white on white, and every shape and facet had to be clearly visible, so no two were lit exactly the same. I went with him to the lab after approving a clip test on one of a dozen rolls that day, and when he spread them out on the light table, and every exposure, lighting on every facet, every frame was perfect, and in a white on white way, it was breathtaking in its competence.

Not art, but definitely good, and definitely professional.

If your art, competence or people skills allow you to differentiate yourself from the rest of the world in the minds of enough customers to pay you a living you are willing to accept, you get to be a professional. In a field where ownership of a camera allows one to take adequately competent pictures for a large number of customers’ uses, I can understand the bitterness in your friend’s saying.

As for my being a photographer, well I know photographers, I’ve worked with photographers, and I, sir, am no photographer, but I do own a camera, and aspire to be a photographer. I know the difference, but not everyone does.

By the way, here is more on the subject straight from the source.

 

The Last Word

← Nikon Z7 PDAF banding FAQs On the thinness on the ground of accidental PDAF banding →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.