• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Where to go with the color reproduction series?

Where to go with the color reproduction series?

December 23, 2015 JimK 1 Comment

This is the fourteenth in a series of posts on color reproduction. The series starts here.

When I started this series of posts, I wanted to educate you all about the nature of the color reproduction problem, what some of the common — and not-so-common — techniques for dealing with non-Luther cameras are, what pitfalls are likely to be encountered, and how to do color accuracy testing for yourself. In this last objective, I limited myself to tools that you could find on the web, like Bruce Lindbloom’s Macbeth color checker spreadsheet.

That’s fine for a few spot checks, but some of the issues, like the effect of varying the illuminant, needs a fair amount of samples. Transferring data points by hand from Ps to a spreadsheet is too error prone and too slow, not to mention way too boring. So, to proceed further, I’m going to move to Matlab. I’ll be happy to post my code as I’ve done in the past, but I know that the ability of many of you to follow along at home will be adversely affected. Sorry.

There will be a hiatus in this series while I write some Matlab code and enjoy the holidays with my family. I will fill in with  some things that are less demanding of my time.

The Last Word

← Gamut and gamma EFCS and Bokeh — a7RII with Sony 90/2.8 macro →

Comments

  1. Lynn Allan says

    December 26, 2015 at 5:48 pm

    I don’t know if the following is relevant or not.

    I use the QpCard-203 and free QpCalibration for custom camera profiles. Seems to work at least reasonably well for repro-graphics’ish accuracy. Or not?

    The software does provide an “Inspect” capability that claims to show the De2k for each of the 35 patches, and overall.

    Entertaining, but this non-color scientist has no way to check it’s accuracy.

    Here’s a link to a screen-shot from QpCalibration:
    http://berean.zenfolio.com/misc/h6ee07807

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.