• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / a9 / Worst-case Sony a9 self heating

Worst-case Sony a9 self heating

June 11, 2017 JimK 1 Comment

This is the 23rd in a series of posts on the Sony a9. The series starts here.

In this post, I tested a fairly severe a9 use case and found:

  • A rise over ambient looked like it was going to get to about 17 or 18 degrees C above ambient.
  • A time constant of about half an hour.

From yesterday’s testing, it is apparent that the average dc current with the tested use case was about 850 ma. There are shooting scenarios that produce higher average currents. The worst one I’ve found is 20 fps ES shooting. However, that is not sustainable, because once the buffer is full, the frame rate drops to about 2 fps with a 150 MB/s SD card. I haven’t tested Sony’s fastest card — and I will as soon as I can get my hands on it, but up to 150 MB/s, write power is a very weak function of write rate. 

And then there’s AF and IBIS, which both increase current drain, but not by much.

I’m going to throw all that together and guess that IBIS/OSS and AF could conspire to raise the sustainable current draw to one amp. That means that we could conceivably see a 21 degree C rise over ambient. I son’t know the shutoff temperature, either in Standard or High mode, so I can’t say what ambient temperature would cause the camera to shut down with a one amp draw for a long time. 

I will say that the a9 can consume more power, and therefore generate more heat, than, say, an a7RII. It looks to me that the a9 is only marginally better at getting rid of that heat than the a7RII. Assuming the shutoff temps in the two cameras are similar, the a9 will shut down with less provocation than an a7RII.

Solar heating undoubtedly plays a big part in many use scenarios, and is difficult to factor in. 

To me, it’s surprising that the a9 manages to go so much faster than the a7RII and consume so little extra power.

 

a9, The Last Word

← Worst-case Sony a9 battery draw Sony a7RII FW 4.0 star-eating →

Comments

  1. Andrew says

    June 12, 2017 at 1:55 am

    I would imagine the effect of of solar heating could be quite significant. I live 1794m above sea level and 24 degrees from the equator and had a Samsung that would shut down in less than a minute shooting outdoors in summer. I was using manual lenses and found stopping them down to the narrowest aperture between shots would help immesley which pointed to the problem being solar radiation. I suspect this could be leading to some of the conflicting reports on overheating.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.