• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / X2D / Hasselblad X2D electronic shutter scan time

Hasselblad X2D electronic shutter scan time

October 1, 2022 JimK 4 Comments

This is the 13th in a series of posts on the Hasselblad X2D 100C camera and the XCD lenses. You will be able to find all the posts in this series by looking at the righthand column on this page and finding the Category “X2D”.

The X2D has an electronic focal plane shutter, which you can choose to use with XCD lenses. It is the only shutter option with non-Hasselblad adapted lenses. Since the sensor appears to be the same as the one in the GFX 100 and GFX 100S, the scan times ought to be the same. BUt it’s easy enough to check, so I did.

I put the CV 125/2.5 Apo Lanthar F on the X2D using a Fotodiox X to F adapter. I aimed the camera at an 120 cycles per second pulse width modulated LED. Each line is separated from the one before and the one after it by 8.33 milliseconds. I tested with both 16 and 14 bit precision.

14 bits, 20 lines

That works out to 0.167 seconds, or about 1/6 of a second.

 

16 bit, 43 lines

 

When the precision is raised to 16 bits, the scan time slow down to 0.387 seconds, or roughly 1/2.5 seconds.

This is, uncoincidentally, virtually the same as I measured for the GFX 100 MP cameras, and the same as Hasselblad specifies in their specs.

X2D

← Hasselblad XCD 38 field flatness Hasselblad XCD 38 mechanical shutter dynamics on X2D →

Comments

  1. Jake says

    February 28, 2023 at 6:20 am

    Hi Jim, does this mean that if I use an adapted lens for flash work, the sync speed cannot exceed 1/2.5 seconds?

    Reply
    • JimK says

      February 28, 2023 at 7:21 am

      You can’t use flash at all with electronic shutter. The camera won’t fire the flash.

      Reply
      • Jake says

        March 10, 2023 at 8:05 am

        Thanks Jim.

        Is there any way st all that I can use it for flash work, with an adapted lens?

        Reply
        • JimK says

          March 10, 2023 at 8:25 am

          Not that I know of.

          Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.