• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / X2D / Hasselblad XCD 38/2.5 lens cap

Hasselblad XCD 38/2.5 lens cap

October 11, 2022 JimK 2 Comments

This is the 22nd in a series of posts on the Hasselblad X2D 100C camera and the XCD lenses. You will be able to find all the posts in this series by looking at the righthand column on this page and finding the Category “X2D”.

The lens cap that comes with the Hasselblad XCD 38 mm f/2.4 lens is beautiful. It’s made mostly of metal. It feels solid. It engages well with the filter threads.

But, for me, at least, it’s not a practical cap. When I change lenses, I set the new lens front lens cap down, on a counter, table, or whatever flat surface is available, and I loosen the rears lens cap. Then I pick up the camera with the old lens attached. I take it off the body, and put it down on the flat surface on the front lens cap, swap the rear lens caps, and mount the new lens. As you can see above, the Hasselblad lens cab has a protrusion that makes it not very stable even on a herd flat surface, and not stable at all on some surfaces that I’ve had to work with.

The fix is swapping in another 72mm front lens cap:

However, there’s a problem with this workaround. The looks that I expect to get from other X2D photographers when they see this:

X2D

← Hasselblad X2D ISOlessness, visuals Hasselblad X2D exposure strategy, M and A modes →

Comments

  1. Eric Brody says

    October 15, 2022 at 5:01 pm

    I have a similar but not so severe problem with the Voightlander lens caps for my CV 50 f/2 APO and CV 110 f/2.5 APO for my Sony A7RIV. They have a small protrusion which makes them wobble when placed on a hard surface. Both caps attach to the front of the screw in lens hood making them even more unstable. I’ve not gotten around to replacing them but plan to at some point.

    Reply
  2. Erik Kaffehr says

    October 16, 2022 at 8:58 am

    Bright idea to combine good lenscap design with lens. A bit of black or pink gaffer tape may solve the ‘look from X2D photographers’ issue.

    In my experience, encounters with MFD photographers is pretty rare. I have just observed one photographer shooting MFD.

    But, I can think that MFD photographers may be more abundant on US west coast than here in Sweden.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.