• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / X2D / UniWB on the X2D

UniWB on the X2D

May 29, 2023 JimK 2 Comments

This is the 42nd in a series of posts on the Hasselblad X2D 100C camera and the XCD lenses. You will be able to find all the posts in this series by looking at the righthand column on this page and finding the Category “X2D”.

If you’ve read this set of posts, then you’ll know what UniWB is and how to use it. If you haven’t read those posts, the Cliff Notes on UniWB is that it’s a was to get the histogram in your camera to more closely match the raw histogram than would otherwise be the case.

Using UniWB means working with a greenish EVF image, and many people don’t like to do it for that reason. With the X2D, it’s easy to program in a preset white balance, and switch back and forth between that and the other WB settings. The camera remembers the setting you programmed in, so it’s pretty simple to switch to manual WB, check the histogram, and then switch the WB back to something that gives more natural-looking colors. The big issue with the X2D is that it doesn’t have a live histogram, so in order to check the exposure, you have to switch to manual WB, take a shot, look at the review histogram, switch back to taking mode, switch the WB to something that gives you decent looking colors, and take the picture.

I’m sure hoping the next firmware release for the X2D has live histograms.

 

Here’s the back of the camera in review mode with auto WB used to make the exposure.

 

Here’s the raw histogram with auto WB used to make the exposure.

It’s clear that the red channel in the back-of-camera shot is too high.

Here’s the back of the camera in review mode with manual WB with color temperature set to 4800 and the tint set all the way to 100% green (tint= -100) used to make the exposure.

 

Here’s the raw histogram with manual WB with the tint set all the way to 100% green used to make the exposure.

The red channel in the back-of-camera shot is still too high.

Lowering the color temperature to 2500 and leaving the tint all the way green (-100) gets the red and green channels to have about the right relationship:

Here’s the back of the camera in review mode with manual WB with temperature set to 2500 and with the tint set all the way to 100% green used to make the exposure.

 

 

X2D

← Specularity, part 2 Hasselblad X2D firmware 2.0 →

Comments

  1. Ad Dieleman says

    May 30, 2023 at 1:39 am

    Unrelated to white balance, but what’s going on with the multiple levels in the blue histograms? It looks like there can be drawn 3 different curves through the blue levels. I ask because I see a similar pattern in histograms of my Fuji X100V, never seen this in histograms of my Sony A7, A7R2 or A7R4. Very curious.

    By the way, all the best with coping with your unfortunate accident. Regards, Ad.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      May 30, 2023 at 3:48 pm

      “…what’s going on with the multiple levels in the blue histograms? It looks like there can be drawn 3 different curves through the blue levels”

      You mean the combing? I don’t know what causes that, but it’s not unusual.

      And thanks for the kind thoughts.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.