the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / Specularity, part 2

Specularity, part 2

May 23, 2023 JimK 1 Comment

In the last post, I talked about specularity. If you haven’t read that post, it would enhance your understanding of this one if you took a look at it now. Although I mentioned the light source as a component of specularity, all the examples I posted related to changing the object in front of the camera. However, the light source plays a big role.

Remember this diagram of light being reflected from a specular surface?

Specular reflection

If the light source is small, there’s going to be a hot spot.

But here’s a diagram with a broad light source:

You’ll still see the reflection of the light source, but it will be much more even.

Here’s an example.

I started with an Aputure 300X and no light modifier:

I pointed it at the controller for the light and took a picture:

Big hot spot.

Then I put a diffuser on the light:

 

Here’s what the controller looks like with that diffuser over the light:

There still is a reflection, but it’s broad and nowhere near as strong. If you want to tame specular reflections and you’re in control of the lighting, diffuse the lights to make the source large, and get the lights close to the subject.

The Last Word

← Specularity UniWB on the X2D →

Comments

  1. Christer Almqvist says

    May 24, 2023 at 7:29 am

    Well illustrated.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

December 2023
S M T W T F S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  
« Nov    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Hasselblad 90/2.5 XCD-V on X2D — Siemens star
  • JimK on Hasselblad XCD 90/2.5 V lens on X2D
  • Marko on Hasselblad XCD 90/2.5 V lens on X2D
  • Glen on Hasselblad 90/2.5 XCD-V on X2D — Siemens star
  • JimK on Hasselblad 90/2.5 XCD on X2D, edge falloff
  • Mario Acerra on Hasselblad 90/2.5 XCD on X2D, edge falloff
  • Nikojorj on More on Foveon image processing
  • Jakob Bogenberger on Why Foveon images are so noisy
  • JimK on More on Foveon image processing
  • Nikojorj on More on Foveon image processing

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.