• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / Z50 / Nikon Z50 EDR and read noise spectra

Nikon Z50 EDR and read noise spectra

November 11, 2019 JimK Leave a Comment

This is the first in a series of posts on the Nikon Z50. You should be able to find all the posts about that camera in the Category List on the right sidebar, below the Articles widget. There’s a drop-down menu there that you can use to get to all the posts in this series; just look for “Z50”.

I don’t normally test APS-C cameras anymore, having sworn off the Sony ones because I found their user interface frustrating when switching from an a7x or a9x. But I was intrigued with Nikon’s diminutive — and cheap — Z50, so I bought one with the kit zoom. I picked it up today, and did some dark field (body cap in place) image-making and analysis.

There appears to be no electronic shutter. I used ECCS. There also aren’t the usual Nikon file format choices. I picked 14-bit, which appears to be compressed. I’m counting on the form of that  compression being lossless. I used 1/1000 second for an ISO series. Here’s the engineering dynamic range (EDR) for each of the raw channels:

I’m defining EDR as full scale over read noise. This is quite credible.There appears to be a conversion gain change at the transition from ISO 320 to ISO 400. There also seems to be digital noise suppression above ISO 10000.

In modern cameras with on-sensor  phase-detection autofocus (OSPDAF, or must PDAF if it’s understood you’re talking about MILCs), the spectra of the read noise has been interesting. Here are spectra for all four raw channels at ISO 100:

Plane 1 is the red channel. It looks perfect. fs is the sampling frequency of the channel. f = fs/2 is the Nyquist frequency for the channel. The sampling frequency of the whole sensor is twice the sampling frequency for any of the raw channels.

So does the first green channel.

So does the second green channel.

But the blue channel has the periodic spikes that we’ve come to know, if not love.

The spikes get smaller as the ISO rises and the read noise overwhelms them. By ISO 1000 they are almsot gone and only the lowpass effect of the PDAF interpolation remains:

At ISO 12800, a very slight lowpass effect creeps in on the other raw channels:

Even at ISO 51200, it’s not bad at all:

 

I wish the Sony a9II spectra looked this clean.

 

 

 

 

Z50

← How many big prints? Nikon Z50 EDR, spectra vs shutter speed →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.